AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Paige K. Bugg

Examiner Paige K. Bugg appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 46.2%, they average 2.25 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.25
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
8 years (2019-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-8053
Predicted Supervisor
Kendra Carter
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-9034
Tech Center
3700 - Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing and Products
Group
3780 - Body Treatment, Kinesitherapy, and Exercising

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
273
Granted Applications
126
Non-Granted Applications
147
Avg OA / Grant
2.25
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3785
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 46.2% 2.25
Art Unit 77 36.2% 1.74
Group 288 43.4% 1.90
Tech Center 2,632 49.9% 2.01
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2019; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2019 6 2 33.3%
2020 31 20 64.5%
2021 40 22 55.0%
2022 32 20 62.5%
2023 38 19 50.0%
2024 57 31 54.4%
2025 48 12 25.0%
2026 21 0 0.0%

126 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 263 0.4% 4.2% 73.0% 7.2%
2 151 0.0% 2.0% 84.8% 2.0%
3 73 0.0% 2.7% 89.0% 2.7%
4 45 0.0% 0.0% 95.6% 2.2%
5 26 0.0% 0.0% 88.5% 0.0%
6 16 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
0.0%
2024
1.4%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.