Examiner Philip C Edwards

Grant ratio: 76.6% (99th percentile in Art Unit 3792 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.49. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 76.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.49
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88045
Primary art unit
3792
Work group
3790
Technology center
3700
Applications
580
Granted applications
444
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1804
Supervisor
Unsu Jung
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-8506

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 52 39.5% 2.30
Group 334 38.9% 2.25
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.57 910 office actions across 580 applications
Applications with office actions 99.7% 578 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.3%
1 OA 357 61.6%
2 OAs 148 25.5%
3 OAs 48 8.3%
4 OAs 17 2.9%
5+ OAs 8 1.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 83.3% 2011 2012: 73.7% 2012 2013: 70.6% 2013 2014: 88.9% 2014 2015: 74.2% 2015 2016: 90.9% 2016 2017: 90.9% 2017 2018: 91.7% 2018 2019: 90.5% 2019 2020: 100.0% 2020 2021: 95.2% 2021 2022: 91.4% 2022 2023: 93.1% 2023 2024: 78.1% 2024 2025: 18.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20116583.3%
2012382873.7%
2013342470.6%
2014454088.9%
2015312374.2%
2016444090.9%
2017444090.9%
2018363391.7%
2019423890.5%
20204545100.0%
2021424095.2%
2022353291.4%
2023292793.1%
2024322578.1%
202522418.2%
20265500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 578 2.6% 18.7% 75.6% 2.8%
Action 2 221 1.8% 11.8% 84.2% 0.9%
Action 3 73 0.0% 8.2% 89.0% 0.0%
Action 4 25 0.0% 4.0% 92.0% 0.0%
Action 5 8 0.0% 12.5% 87.5% 0.0%
Action 6 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.0% 2 of 192 office actions
All years 2.1% 19 of 910 office actions
Change -1.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.1%
1.9%
2014: Alice
3.1%
1.8%
4.4%
0.0%
4.3%
2019: PEG
5.7%
1.8%
0.0%
3.6%
5.3%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
1.5%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 7 reversed.

Full reversal rate
87.5% 7/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
87.5% 7/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
25.1 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 31, 2018 14/091,863 Reversed New ground of rejection §103 · §112
Aug. 28, 2017 13/446,801 Reversed §102 · §112
May. 25, 2017 13/388,998 Reversed §102 · §103
Jan. 24, 2017 14/015,770 Reversed §103
Oct. 21, 2016 12/921,789 Reversed §102 · §103
Apr. 25, 2016 13/032,509 Affirmed N/A
Feb. 23, 2016 12/170,037 Reversed N/A
Dec. 15, 2015 12/682,923 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.