AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Philip C Edwards

Examiner Philip C Edwards appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 78.7%, they average 1.49 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.49
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
16 years (2011-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-1804
Predicted Supervisor
Unsu Jung
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-8506
Tech Center
3700 - Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing and Products
Group
3790 - Medical Instruments, Diagnostic Equipment, and Treatment Devices

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
564
Granted Applications
444
Non-Granted Applications
120
Avg OA / Grant
1.49
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3762 , 3792
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 78.7% 1.49
Art Unit 48 42.2% 2.31
Group 327 40.3% 2.25
Tech Center 2,632 49.9% 2.01
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2011; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2011 6 5 83.3%
2012 38 28 73.7%
2013 34 24 70.6%
2014 45 40 88.9%
2015 31 23 74.2%
2016 44 40 90.9%
2017 44 40 90.9%
2018 36 33 91.7%
2019 42 38 90.5%
2020 45 45 100.0%
2021 42 40 95.2%
2022 35 32 91.4%
2023 29 27 93.1%
2024 32 25 78.1%
2025 40 4 10.0%
2026 21 0 0.0%

444 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 562 2.7% 19.2% 74.9% 2.5%
2 205 2.0% 12.7% 82.9% 1.0%
3 64 0.0% 9.4% 89.1% 0.0%
4 24 0.0% 4.2% 95.8% 0.0%
5 8 0.0% 12.5% 87.5% 0.0%
6 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2011
1.1%
2012
1.9%
2013
3.1%
2014
1.8%
2015
4.4%
2016
0.0%
2017
4.3%
2018
5.7%
2019
1.8%
2020
0.0%
2021
3.6%
2022
5.3%
2023
0.0%
2024
1.5%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.