Examiner Amanda L Steinberg

Grant ratio: 37.9% (34th percentile in Art Unit 3792 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.25. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 37.9%
Average office actions / grant 3.25
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
92467
Primary art unit
3792
Work group
3790
Technology center
3700
Applications
422
Granted applications
160
Examiner phone
(303) 297-4783
Supervisor
James Kish
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-5554

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 52 39.5% 2.30
Group 334 38.9% 2.25
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.94 1,242 office actions across 422 applications
Applications with office actions 98.3% 415 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 7 1.7%
1 OA 106 25.1%
2 OAs 122 28.9%
3 OAs 59 14.0%
4 OAs 46 10.9%
5+ OAs 82 19.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2015: 33.3% 2015 2016: 36.1% 2016 2017: 31.6% 2017 2018: 46.4% 2018 2019: 50.0% 2019 2020: 62.5% 2020 2021: 66.7% 2021 2022: 55.2% 2022 2023: 50.0% 2023 2024: 33.3% 2024 2025: 17.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20159333.3%
2016361336.1%
201719631.6%
2018281346.4%
2019422150.0%
2020402562.5%
2021332266.7%
2022291655.2%
2023402050.0%
2024391333.3%
202546817.4%
20266100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 415 1.2% 9.2% 87.5% 1.2%
Action 2 309 0.3% 7.1% 88.0% 2.3%
Action 3 187 2.1% 6.4% 87.2% 3.2%
Action 4 128 3.9% 7.0% 85.2% 3.1%
Action 5 82 3.7% 1.2% 92.7% 1.2%
Action 6 52 1.9% 0.0% 98.1% 0.0%
Action 7 30 0.0% 0.0% 90.0% 6.7%
Action 8 20 5.0% 0.0% 80.0% 10.0%
Action 9 12 8.3% 0.0% 58.3% 25.0%
Action 10 5 0.0% 0.0% 40.0% 40.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 3.5% 12 of 341 office actions
All years 1.7% 21 of 1,242 office actions
Change +1.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.1%
2019: PEG
1.7%
1.0%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
2.7%
2025: August memo
4.7%
4.8%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 21. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 5 affirmed in part, and 10 reversed.

Full reversal rate
47.6% 10/21 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
71.4% 15/21 decisions
Median appeal duration
10.9 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 12, 2026 17/555,878 Reversed §103
Oct. 28, 2025 17/318,428 Reversed §102 · §103
Sep. 16, 2025 16/500,883 Affirmed §101 · §103
Jul. 23, 2025 17/148,454 Affirmed §103
May. 15, 2025 17/852,540 Affirmed §103
Feb. 2, 2022 15/910,711 Affirmed in part §103
Jan. 21, 2022 14/063,669 Reversed §103
Dec. 24, 2021 14/401,657 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §103
Dec. 8, 2021 15/949,266 Reversed §103
Nov. 5, 2021 14/271,041 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Jun. 15, 2021 14/328,107 Affirmed §103
May. 4, 2021 15/318,449 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.