Examiner Jonathan T Kuo

Grant ratio: 61.3% (73rd percentile in Art Unit 3792 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.31. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 61.3%
Average office actions / grant 2.31
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
92810
Primary art unit
3792
Work group
3790
Technology center
3700
Applications
509
Granted applications
312
Examiner phone
(408) 918-7534
Supervisor
Niketa Patel
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4156

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 52 39.5% 2.30
Group 334 38.9% 2.25
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.18 1,109 office actions across 509 applications
Applications with office actions 97.4% 496 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 13 2.6%
1 OA 228 44.8%
2 OAs 123 24.2%
3 OAs 48 9.4%
4 OAs 48 9.4%
5+ OAs 49 9.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2016: 40.7% 2016 2017: 70.6% 2017 2018: 61.1% 2018 2019: 62.8% 2019 2020: 73.5% 2020 2021: 79.5% 2021 2022: 80.8% 2022 2023: 74.5% 2023 2024: 93.0% 2024 2025: 40.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2016271140.7%
2017342470.6%
2018362261.1%
2019432762.8%
2020685073.5%
2021443579.5%
2022524280.8%
2023513874.5%
2024434093.0%
2025572340.4%
20265400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 496 1.4% 7.9% 81.0% 5.0%
Action 2 268 1.1% 3.0% 92.2% 0.7%
Action 3 145 0.7% 2.8% 93.1% 2.8%
Action 4 97 0.0% 2.1% 92.8% 3.1%
Action 5 49 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 31 0.0% 0.0% 96.8% 0.0%
Action 7 15 0.0% 0.0% 86.7% 13.3%
Action 8 6 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 16.7%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 3.0% 8 of 269 office actions
All years 1.0% 11 of 1,109 office actions
Change +2.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
2.6%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
3.7%
2025: August memo
0.0%
7.7%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
60.0% 3/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
80.0% 4/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
12.8 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 13, 2021 16/062,180 Reversed §103
Feb. 26, 2021 15/678,959 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jan. 4, 2021 14/923,101 Reversed §103
Nov. 3, 2020 14/379,917 Affirmed in part §103
Dec. 17, 2019 14/595,312 Reversed New ground of rejection §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.