Examiner James R Moss

Grant ratio: 39.8% (38th percentile in Art Unit 3792 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.28. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 39.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.28
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
93818
Primary art unit
3792
Work group
3790
Technology center
3700
Applications
309
Granted applications
123
Examiner phone
(571) 272-3506
Supervisor
James Kish
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-5554

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 52 39.5% 2.30
Group 334 38.9% 2.25
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.32 718 office actions across 309 applications
Applications with office actions 95.5% 295 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 14 4.5%
1 OA 111 35.9%
2 OAs 69 22.3%
3 OAs 57 18.4%
4 OAs 27 8.7%
5+ OAs 31 10.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2018: 33.3% 2018 2019: 50.0% 2019 2020: 68.3% 2020 2021: 40.7% 2021 2022: 37.5% 2022 2023: 39.3% 2023 2024: 66.7% 2024 2025: 14.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201815533.3%
2019361850.0%
2020412868.3%
2021271140.7%
2022401537.5%
2023281139.3%
2024453066.7%
202534514.7%
20264300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 295 2.0% 5.1% 75.6% 2.4%
Action 2 184 3.8% 1.6% 82.1% 2.2%
Action 3 115 4.3% 0.0% 79.1% 5.2%
Action 4 58 6.9% 0.0% 77.6% 6.9%
Action 5 31 3.2% 0.0% 83.9% 3.2%
Action 6 11 9.1% 0.0% 81.8% 9.1%
Action 7 8 0.0% 12.5% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 8 6 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 5.9% 14 of 239 office actions
All years 3.3% 24 of 718 office actions
Change +2.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
8.2%
4.3%
2024: AI examples
7.0%
2025: August memo
3.0%
6.4%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
12.5% 1/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 4/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
7.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 31, 2026 17/747,230 Reversed §103
Sep. 10, 2025 17/187,344 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §112
May. 15, 2025 16/761,669 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Apr. 8, 2025 16/718,753 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Apr. 16, 2024 17/510,357 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §112
Mar. 18, 2024 17/057,990 Affirmed §101
Sep. 7, 2022 16/369,948 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Jul. 1, 2020 15/616,028 Affirmed §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.