Examiner Colin T. Sakamoto

Grant ratio: 59.0% (90th percentile in Art Unit 3793 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.64. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 59.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.64
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89167
Primary art unit
3793
Work group
3790
Technology center
3700
Applications
498
Granted applications
294
Examiner phone
(571) 272-4958
Supervisor
Keith M. Raymond
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-1790

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 38 47.4% 2.26
Group 334 38.9% 2.25
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.63 1,308 office actions across 498 applications
Applications with office actions 98.4% 490 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 8 1.6%
1 OA 190 38.2%
2 OAs 103 20.7%
3 OAs 65 13.1%
4 OAs 60 12.0%
5+ OAs 72 14.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 100.0% 2009 2012: 33.3% 2012 2013: 38.5% 2013 2014: 54.8% 2014 2015: 56.3% 2015 2016: 54.8% 2016 2017: 64.5% 2017 2018: 50.0% 2018 2019: 43.8% 2019 2020: 42.4% 2020 2021: 89.5% 2021 2022: 84.6% 2022 2023: 86.8% 2023 2024: 80.0% 2024 2025: 48.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200911100.0%
20123133.3%
2013261038.5%
2014311754.8%
2015482756.3%
2016311754.8%
2017312064.5%
2018241250.0%
2019321443.8%
2020331442.4%
2021575189.5%
2022393384.6%
2023383386.8%
2024302480.0%
2025412048.8%
20263300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 490 2.0% 6.5% 64.9% 12.9%
Action 2 300 5.0% 6.0% 60.3% 21.3%
Action 3 197 3.6% 3.0% 71.1% 18.3%
Action 4 132 3.0% 0.8% 72.0% 20.5%
Action 5 72 5.6% 1.4% 63.9% 23.6%
Action 6 55 3.6% 0.0% 69.1% 21.8%
Action 7 30 6.7% 0.0% 70.0% 20.0%
Action 8 16 0.0% 0.0% 68.8% 31.3%
Action 9 8 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0%
Action 10 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.1% 3 of 140 office actions
All years 3.4% 44 of 1,308 office actions
Change -1.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
10.0%
0.0%
2.3%
2014: Alice
4.7%
12.5%
4.6%
3.6%
4.2%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.9%
0.8%
1.5%
2.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
1.9%
2.6%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
11.6 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 29, 2021 15/583,852 Affirmed §103
Mar. 28, 2019 14/378,179 Reversed §112
May. 4, 2018 13/133,742 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 21, 2017 12/608,234 Affirmed §102 · §103
Sep. 16, 2013 11/386,394 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.