Examiner Sean D Mattson

Grant ratio: 55.8% (86th percentile in Art Unit 3793 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.45. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 55.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.45
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
93340
Primary art unit
3793
Work group
3790
Technology center
3700
Applications
405
Granted applications
226
Examiner phone
(408) 918-7613
Supervisor
Pascal Bui-Pho
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2714

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 38 47.4% 2.26
Group 334 38.9% 2.25
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.31 937 office actions across 405 applications
Applications with office actions 96.3% 390 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 15 3.7%
1 OA 146 36.0%
2 OAs 115 28.4%
3 OAs 45 11.1%
4 OAs 41 10.1%
5+ OAs 43 10.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2016: 66.7% 2016 2017: 18.2% 2017 2018: 33.3% 2018 2019: 42.9% 2019 2020: 51.1% 2020 2021: 81.3% 2021 2022: 85.0% 2022 2023: 85.7% 2023 2024: 79.2% 2024 2025: 54.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20163266.7%
201722418.2%
2018331133.3%
2019351542.9%
2020452351.1%
2021483981.3%
2022403485.0%
2023353085.7%
2024483879.2%
2025553054.5%
20264100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 390 2.1% 1.3% 68.7% 12.6%
Action 2 244 2.9% 1.6% 81.1% 7.0%
Action 3 129 3.1% 2.3% 78.3% 12.4%
Action 4 84 4.8% 1.2% 83.3% 9.5%
Action 5 43 2.3% 0.0% 76.7% 20.9%
Action 6 25 0.0% 0.0% 96.0% 4.0%
Action 7 10 0.0% 0.0% 90.0% 10.0%
Action 8 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.7% 7 of 262 office actions
All years 2.6% 24 of 937 office actions
Change +0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
7.4%
2.0%
2019: PEG
2.8%
0.0%
1.1%
1.4%
2.2%
2024: AI examples
2.1%
2025: August memo
3.3%
2.2%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
12.2 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 3, 2022 14/766,448 Affirmed §103
Aug. 1, 2022 15/784,329 Affirmed §103 · §112
May. 5, 2022 14/709,800 Affirmed §103 · §112
Oct. 17, 2019 14/190,591 Affirmed New ground of rejection §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.