Examiner Brian M. Antiskay

Grant ratio: 60.1% (76th percentile in Art Unit 3794 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.62. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 60.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.62
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87669
Primary art unit
3794
Work group
3790
Technology center
3700
Applications
606
Granted applications
364
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5179
Supervisor
Joseph Stoklosa
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-1213

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 48 39.8% 2.24
Group 334 38.9% 2.25
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.56 1,554 office actions across 606 applications
Applications with office actions 98.5% 597 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 9 1.5%
1 OA 209 34.5%
2 OAs 154 25.4%
3 OAs 88 14.5%
4 OAs 61 10.1%
5+ OAs 85 14.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 43.3% 2011 2012: 58.1% 2012 2013: 84.4% 2013 2014: 59.5% 2014 2015: 46.7% 2015 2016: 66.0% 2016 2017: 60.4% 2017 2018: 68.8% 2018 2019: 59.5% 2019 2020: 81.8% 2020 2021: 57.6% 2021 2022: 75.0% 2022 2023: 74.3% 2023 2024: 83.3% 2024 2025: 41.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2011301343.3%
2012432558.1%
2013322784.4%
2014372259.5%
2015301446.7%
2016473166.0%
2017482960.4%
2018322268.8%
2019372259.5%
2020443681.8%
2021331957.6%
2022362775.0%
2023352674.3%
2024423583.3%
2025391641.0%
20264100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 597 0.3% 2.2% 86.8% 2.5%
Action 2 388 0.0% 1.0% 94.6% 0.8%
Action 3 234 0.4% 2.6% 96.2% 0.0%
Action 4 146 0.7% 1.4% 95.2% 2.1%
Action 5 85 0.0% 1.2% 97.6% 0.0%
Action 6 52 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 28 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 225 office actions
All years 0.3% 4 of 1,554 office actions
Change -0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
10.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 29, 2022 14/372,494 Affirmed §103 · §112
Feb. 8, 2021 12/982,675 Affirmed §103 · §112
Sep. 28, 2020 13/097,399 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.