Examiner Pamela F Wu

Grant ratio: 42.3% (45th percentile in Art Unit 3795 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.76. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 42.3%
Average office actions / grant 2.76
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
93146
Primary art unit
3795
Work group
3790
Technology center
3700
Applications
345
Granted applications
146
Examiner phone
(571) 272-9851
Supervisor
Michael Carey
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-7235

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 50.1% 2.02
Group 334 38.9% 2.25
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.55 879 office actions across 345 applications
Applications with office actions 97.1% 335 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 10 2.9%
1 OA 86 24.9%
2 OAs 134 38.8%
3 OAs 32 9.3%
4 OAs 40 11.6%
5+ OAs 43 12.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2016: 33.3% 2016 2017: 35.5% 2017 2018: 51.4% 2018 2019: 53.6% 2019 2020: 65.5% 2020 2021: 48.6% 2021 2022: 69.4% 2022 2023: 64.7% 2023 2024: 63.6% 2024 2025: 10.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20163133.3%
2017311135.5%
2018371951.4%
2019281553.6%
2020291965.5%
2021351748.6%
2022362569.4%
2023342264.7%
2024221463.6%
202529310.3%
20266100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 335 0.0% 10.4% 63.9% 5.4%
Action 2 249 0.4% 9.6% 67.5% 8.4%
Action 3 115 0.0% 7.8% 74.8% 7.0%
Action 4 83 0.0% 6.0% 71.1% 12.0%
Action 5 43 0.0% 2.3% 81.4% 7.0%
Action 6 26 0.0% 0.0% 88.5% 7.7%
Action 7 11 9.1% 0.0% 72.7% 0.0%
Action 8 8 0.0% 0.0% 62.5% 25.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 239 office actions
All years 0.2% 2 of 879 office actions
Change -0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 0 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
75.0% 3/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
100.0% 4/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
9.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 13, 2026 16/926,414 Reversed §102 · §103
Jun. 25, 2025 17/952,043 Reversed §102 · §103
Apr. 20, 2022 15/397,158 Affirmed in part §103
Oct. 2, 2020 14/729,664 Reversed §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.