AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Michael C. Astorino

Appears inactive Last observed office action: December 2009 (198 months ago).

Examiner Michael C. Astorino appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 8.9%, they average 2.00 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile leans toward §102 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC About Average
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.00
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
2 years (2008-2009)
Tech Center
3700 - Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing and Products
Group
3760 - Refrigeration, Vaporization, Ventilation, and Combustion

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
45
Granted Applications
4
Non-Granted Applications
41
Avg OA / Grant
2.00
Last OA Observed
December 2009 (198 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3736 , 3769
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 8.9% 2.00
Art Unit 32 33.6% 2.26
Group 377 50.6% 2.11
Tech Center 2,632 49.9% 2.01
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 18 1 5.6%
2009 27 3 11.1%
No observed data after 2009; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

4 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 45 4.4% 55.6% 33.3% 6.7%
2 20 5.0% 45.0% 45.0% 5.0%
3 7 0.0% 14.3% 57.1% 28.6%
4 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
5 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

4.5%
2008
3.2%
2009

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.