Examiner Alan D Diamond

Grant ratio: 55.7% (23rd percentile in Art Unit 3991 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.87. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 55.7%
Average office actions / grant 1.87
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
70817
Primary art unit
3991
Work group
3990
Technology center
3900
Applications
228
Granted applications
127
Examiner phone
(571) 272-1338
Supervisor
Patricia Engle
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-6660

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 17 66.4% 1.78
Group 72 56.0% 2.28
Tech Center 70 55.6% 2.30
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.86 423 office actions across 228 applications
Applications with office actions 96.5% 220 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 8 3.5%
1 OA 114 50.0%
2 OAs 68 29.8%
3 OAs 14 6.1%
4 OAs 10 4.4%
5+ OAs 14 6.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 0.0% 2012 2014: 100.0% 2014 2015: 71.4% 2015 2016: 66.7% 2016 2017: 68.8% 2017 2018: 84.6% 2018 2019: 73.7% 2019 2020: 76.2% 2020 2021: 64.7% 2021 2022: 61.9% 2022 2023: 70.8% 2023 2024: 66.7% 2024 2025: 40.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2012100.0%
201411100.0%
20157571.4%
20169666.7%
2017161168.8%
2018131184.6%
2019191473.7%
2020211676.2%
2021171164.7%
2022211361.9%
2023241770.8%
2024181266.7%
2025251040.0%
20263600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 220 0.9% 7.3% 27.3% 15.0%
Action 2 106 1.9% 5.7% 30.2% 13.2%
Action 3 38 0.0% 0.0% 55.3% 10.5%
Action 4 24 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 12.5%
Action 5 14 0.0% 0.0% 57.1% 14.3%
Action 6 6 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 16.7%
Action 7 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 117 office actions
All years 0.9% 4 of 423 office actions
Change -0.9 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
7.4%
6.3%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
3.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 27, 2024 16/727,447 Affirmed §101 · §112 · §120
Jan. 14, 2021 15/809,233 Affirmed §101 · §120
Feb. 26, 2020 15/256,162 Affirmed §103 · §112
Apr. 29, 2014 11/796,695 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.