Examiner William C Doerrler

Grant ratio: 69.7% (61st percentile in Art Unit 3993 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.69. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 69.7%
Average office actions / grant 1.69
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
69283
Primary art unit
3993
Work group
3990
Technology center
3900
Applications
433
Granted applications
302
Examiner phone
(571) 272-4807
Supervisor
Patricia Engle
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-6928

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 17 62.1% 2.26
Group 72 55.7% 2.28
Tech Center 70 55.3% 2.30
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.63 705 office actions across 433 applications
Applications with office actions 98.8% 428 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 5 1.2%
1 OA 258 59.6%
2 OAs 120 27.7%
3 OAs 24 5.5%
4 OAs 12 2.8%
5+ OAs 14 3.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 71.4% 2008 2009: 84.4% 2009 2013: 100.0% 2013 2014: 77.8% 2014 2015: 60.0% 2015 2016: 92.3% 2016 2017: 63.2% 2017 2018: 93.8% 2018 2019: 81.0% 2019 2020: 88.2% 2020 2021: 84.2% 2021 2022: 85.2% 2022 2023: 94.4% 2023 2024: 73.3% 2024 2025: 36.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200814010071.4%
2009453884.4%
201311100.0%
20149777.8%
201515960.0%
2016131292.3%
2017191263.2%
2018161593.8%
2019211781.0%
2020171588.2%
2021191684.2%
2022272385.2%
2023181794.4%
2024151173.3%
202525936.0%
20263300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 428 1.6% 7.2% 50.2% 10.3%
Action 2 170 0.0% 4.1% 52.4% 11.2%
Action 3 50 0.0% 4.0% 44.0% 18.0%
Action 4 26 3.8% 3.8% 38.5% 19.2%
Action 5 14 0.0% 7.1% 50.0% 7.1%
Action 6 9 0.0% 0.0% 55.6% 0.0%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.9% 1 of 110 office actions
All years 1.1% 8 of 705 office actions
Change -0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
2.9%
3.4%
0.0%
12.9%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
2.6%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 2. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/2 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/2 decisions
Median appeal duration
1.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 15, 2022 16/001,546 Affirmed §103
Sep. 1, 2021 16/403,060 Affirmed §102

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.