Examiner Patricia L Engle

Grant ratio: 61.6% (46th percentile in Art Unit 3993 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.62. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 61.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.62
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
77003
Primary art unit
3993
Work group
3990
Technology center
3900
Applications
229
Granted applications
141
Examiner phone
(571) 272-6660
Supervisor
Eileen Lillis
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-6928

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 17 62.4% 2.26
Group 72 56.0% 2.28
Tech Center 70 55.6% 2.30
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.71 392 office actions across 229 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 229 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 137 59.8%
2 OAs 57 24.9%
3 OAs 18 7.9%
4 OAs 7 3.1%
5+ OAs 10 4.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 65.1% 2009 2010: 81.5% 2010 2014: 66.7% 2014 2015: 44.4% 2015 2016: 45.5% 2016 2017: 64.3% 2017 2018: 75.0% 2018 2019: 50.0% 2019 2020: 60.0% 2020 2021: 62.5% 2021 2022: 60.0% 2022 2023: 70.6% 2023 2024: 50.0% 2024 2025: 44.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2009634165.1%
2010272281.5%
20149666.7%
20159444.4%
201611545.5%
201714964.3%
2018161275.0%
20194250.0%
202010660.0%
20218562.5%
202215960.0%
2023171270.6%
20248450.0%
20259444.4%
2026900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 229 1.3% 7.9% 67.2% 6.6%
Action 2 92 0.0% 6.5% 57.6% 13.0%
Action 3 35 0.0% 2.9% 57.1% 8.6%
Action 4 17 0.0% 11.8% 47.1% 11.8%
Action 5 10 0.0% 10.0% 50.0% 20.0%
Action 6 7 0.0% 14.3% 57.1% 14.3%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 54 office actions
All years 0.8% 3 of 392 office actions
Change -0.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

3.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 1. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Median appeal duration
7.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 18, 2022 29/701,004 Affirmed §101 · §102 · §112 · §120

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.