Examiner Ana Z Muresan

Grant ratio: 67.1% (53rd percentile in Art Unit 1622 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.65. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 67.1%
Average office actions / grant 1.65
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88635
Primary art unit
1622
Work group
1620
Technology center
1600
Applications
745
Granted applications
500
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7587
Supervisor
Brandon Fetterolf
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2919

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 17 41.6% 1.68
Group 252 46.0% 1.76
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.68 1,251 office actions across 745 applications
Applications with office actions 98.7% 735 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 10 1.3%
1 OA 418 56.1%
2 OAs 197 26.4%
3 OAs 68 9.1%
4 OAs 36 4.8%
5+ OAs 16 2.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 80.0% 2012 2013: 65.8% 2013 2014: 72.5% 2014 2015: 64.3% 2015 2016: 67.6% 2016 2017: 85.9% 2017 2018: 82.1% 2018 2019: 85.7% 2019 2020: 67.3% 2020 2021: 72.1% 2021 2022: 72.1% 2022 2023: 73.3% 2023 2024: 82.5% 2024 2025: 33.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2012151280.0%
2013382565.8%
2014513772.5%
2015563664.3%
2016684667.6%
2017716185.9%
2018564682.1%
2019564885.7%
2020493367.3%
2021684972.1%
2022433172.1%
2023302273.3%
2024403382.5%
2025622133.9%
20264200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 735 0.7% 8.0% 55.9% 14.6%
Action 2 317 0.0% 8.8% 62.8% 12.9%
Action 3 120 0.0% 8.3% 65.0% 15.0%
Action 4 52 0.0% 9.6% 63.5% 17.3%
Action 5 16 0.0% 0.0% 62.5% 6.3%
Action 6 8 0.0% 0.0% 87.5% 0.0%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.5% 1 of 211 office actions
All years 0.4% 5 of 1,251 office actions
Change +0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
3.5%
2014: Alice
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
1.1%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
75.0% 3/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
75.0% 3/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
18.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 4, 2025 15/553,638 Affirmed §102 · §103
Nov. 24, 2017 14/118,571 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
Sep. 5, 2017 13/826,394 Reversed §103
Aug. 8, 2017 13/693,281 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.