Examiner Medhanit W Bahta

Grant ratio: 71.7% (78th percentile in Art Unit 1622 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.97. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 71.7%
Average office actions / grant 1.97
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
90074
Primary art unit
1622
Work group
1620
Technology center
1600
Applications
834
Granted applications
598
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7658
Supervisor
Scarlett Goon
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-5241

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 17 41.6% 1.68
Group 252 46.0% 1.76
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.00 1,672 office actions across 834 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 831 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.4%
1 OA 399 47.8%
2 OAs 241 28.9%
3 OAs 100 12.0%
4 OAs 47 5.6%
5+ OAs 44 5.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 100.0% 2011 2013: 85.4% 2013 2014: 72.6% 2014 2015: 79.7% 2015 2016: 82.5% 2016 2017: 84.1% 2017 2018: 84.1% 2018 2019: 79.4% 2019 2020: 87.3% 2020 2021: 84.5% 2021 2022: 84.9% 2022 2023: 82.6% 2023 2024: 75.4% 2024 2025: 40.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201111100.0%
2013413585.4%
2014624572.6%
2015645179.7%
2016574782.5%
2017635384.1%
2018695884.1%
2019685479.4%
2020554887.3%
2021584984.5%
2022534584.9%
2023463882.6%
2024574375.4%
2025763140.8%
20266400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 831 1.2% 12.5% 53.1% 9.6%
Action 2 432 0.7% 10.4% 58.1% 13.7%
Action 3 191 0.0% 11.5% 61.3% 13.1%
Action 4 91 0.0% 12.1% 62.6% 8.8%
Action 5 44 0.0% 4.5% 61.4% 11.4%
Action 6 30 0.0% 0.0% 73.3% 6.7%
Action 7 16 0.0% 6.3% 68.8% 0.0%
Action 8 11 0.0% 0.0% 63.6% 9.1%
Action 9 9 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 22.2%
Action 10 6 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 16.7%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.3% 5 of 385 office actions
All years 0.8% 13 of 1,672 office actions
Change +0.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
1.5%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
1.1%
2024: AI examples
2.4%
2025: August memo
0.0%
2.5%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
66.7% 2/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 2/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
11.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 18, 2023 16/082,389 Affirmed N/A
Feb. 25, 2022 15/321,770 Reversed §103
Jun. 18, 2018 14/240,338 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.