Examiner Elli Peselev

Grant ratio: 57.1% (59th percentile in Art Unit 1623 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.09. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: August 2015
Grant ratio 57.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.09
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
62218
Primary art unit
1623
Work group
1620
Technology center
1600
Applications
693
Granted applications
396

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 25 40.5% 1.90
Group 252 46.0% 1.76
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.98 1,369 office actions across 693 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 693 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 308 44.4%
2 OAs 229 33.0%
3 OAs 78 11.3%
4 OAs 48 6.9%
5+ OAs 30 4.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 44.8% 2008 2009: 56.3% 2009 2010: 33.3% 2010 2011: 56.5% 2011 2012: 68.4% 2012 2013: 69.6% 2013 2014: 60.5% 2014 2015: 82.4% 2015

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008673044.8%
2009965456.3%
20101053533.3%
20111086156.5%
2012956568.4%
20131027169.6%
2014865260.5%
2015342882.4%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 693 1.7% 11.8% 62.8% 18.2%
Action 2 385 0.8% 6.2% 66.8% 17.7%
Action 3 156 0.0% 7.1% 73.7% 15.4%
Action 4 78 1.3% 1.3% 79.5% 14.1%
Action 5 30 0.0% 3.3% 70.0% 23.3%
Action 6 15 0.0% 6.7% 86.7% 6.7%
Action 7 6 0.0% 16.7% 83.3% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 1.2% 16 of 1,369 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2.9%
1.3%
1.9%
0.5%
0.5%
0.6%
2014: Alice
0.8%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 11. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
30.0% 3/10 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 5/10 decisions
Median appeal duration
13.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 8, 2014 11/864,113 Dismissed N/A
Jan. 30, 2013 12/182,354 Affirmed in part §103
Aug. 15, 2012 11/236,038 Reversed §103
Jun. 27, 2012 11/339,650 Affirmed in part N/A
Jun. 13, 2012 11/690,528 Affirmed §103
Feb. 17, 2012 10/536,397 Affirmed §103
Feb. 15, 2012 10/972,729 Affirmed §103
Nov. 17, 2011 10/613,819 Affirmed §103
Oct. 26, 2011 11/481,257 Affirmed §103
Mar. 1, 2011 11/252,245 Reversed §103 · §112
Nov. 29, 2010 10/523,657 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.