Examiner Jody L. Karol

Grant ratio: 42.1% (60th percentile in Art Unit 1627 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.13. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: July 2019
Grant ratio 42.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.13
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83927
Primary art unit
1627
Work group
1620
Technology center
1600
Applications
563
Granted applications
237

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 34.4% 1.93
Group 256 45.0% 1.76
Tech Center 1,380 37.5% 2.02
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.09 1,216 office actions across 583 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 583 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 231 39.6%
2 OAs 191 32.8%
3 OAs 94 16.1%
4 OAs 35 6.0%
5+ OAs 32 5.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 7.4% 2008 2009: 24.4% 2009 2010: 32.7% 2010 2011: 34.5% 2011 2012: 44.0% 2012 2013: 42.4% 2013 2014: 53.7% 2014 2015: 56.1% 2015 2016: 44.4% 2016 2017: 51.6% 2017 2018: 56.3% 2018 2019: 44.4% 2019

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20082727.4%
2009451124.4%
2010521732.7%
2011551934.5%
2012502244.0%
2013592542.4%
2014412253.7%
2015412356.1%
2016542444.4%
2017643351.6%
2018482756.3%
2019271244.4%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 583 0.9% 10.3% 80.3% 5.5%
Action 2 352 0.0% 6.8% 83.2% 6.3%
Action 3 161 0.6% 5.0% 79.5% 8.1%
Action 4 67 0.0% 4.5% 91.0% 1.5%
Action 5 32 0.0% 9.4% 81.3% 3.1%
Action 6 12 0.0% 8.3% 66.7% 16.7%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.5% 6 of 1,216 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.2%
0.8%
0.9%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
2.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 10. Merits outcomes: 8 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
10.0% 1/10 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
20.0% 2/10 decisions
Median appeal duration
22.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 29, 2020 14/293,312 Affirmed §103 · §120
Jul. 29, 2019 14/394,470 Affirmed §103
Nov. 30, 2018 15/003,398 Affirmed §103
Dec. 26, 2017 15/135,580 Reversed §103
Oct. 18, 2016 10/495,697 Affirmed §103
Jun. 2, 2016 12/471,742 Affirmed §103
Jun. 1, 2016 11/883,218 Affirmed in part §103
May. 23, 2016 12/299,535 Affirmed N/A
May. 10, 2016 11/841,183 Affirmed N/A
Jan. 22, 2013 11/573,327 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.