Examiner James D. (Doug) Schultz, Phd

Grant ratio: 60.7% (85th percentile in Art Unit 1633 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.18. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: February 2026
Grant ratio 60.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.18
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
79285
Primary art unit
1633
Work group
1630
Technology center
1600
Applications
504
Granted applications
306

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 31 37.5% 2.18
Group 245 37.4% 2.18
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.26 1,182 office actions across 524 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 524 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 209 39.9%
2 OAs 151 28.8%
3 OAs 79 15.1%
4 OAs 44 8.4%
5+ OAs 41 7.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 100.0% 2008 2009: 60.0% 2009 2010: 61.0% 2010 2011: 58.1% 2011 2012: 59.6% 2012 2013: 62.8% 2013 2014: 51.9% 2014 2015: 71.4% 2015 2016: 54.3% 2016 2017: 53.8% 2017 2018: 58.3% 2018 2019: 69.0% 2019 2020: 64.5% 2020 2021: 71.9% 2021 2022: 61.1% 2022 2023: 62.5% 2023 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200822100.0%
20095360.0%
2010412561.0%
2011311858.1%
2012472859.6%
2013432762.8%
2014542851.9%
2015352571.4%
2016462554.3%
2017392153.8%
2018241458.3%
2019292069.0%
2020312064.5%
2021322371.9%
2022362261.1%
20238562.5%
2026100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 524 3.2% 15.6% 42.2% 9.2%
Action 2 315 0.3% 12.1% 59.0% 11.1%
Action 3 164 1.2% 14.6% 48.2% 14.6%
Action 4 85 5.9% 11.8% 56.5% 8.2%
Action 5 41 4.9% 2.4% 65.9% 0.0%
Action 6 24 0.0% 4.2% 54.2% 12.5%
Action 7 14 0.0% 7.1% 42.9% 28.6%
Action 8 6 0.0% 16.7% 33.3% 0.0%
Action 9 5 0.0% 20.0% 20.0% 0.0%
Action 10 4 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 50.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 1 office actions
All years 2.3% 27 of 1,182 office actions
Change -2.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
0.0%
0.9%
1.0%
2014: Alice
4.0%
5.6%
5.0%
1.2%
0.0%
2019: PEG
4.8%
4.4%
1.3%
0.0%
5.3%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
25.6 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 25, 2019 14/489,934 Affirmed §103
May. 25, 2017 10/575,779 Affirmed §102 · §103
Dec. 29, 2016 12/600,947 Reversed §102
Oct. 7, 2016 12/452,825 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.