Examiner Kimberly A Aron

Grant ratio: 48.3% (62nd percentile in Art Unit 1633 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.34. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 48.3%
Average office actions / grant 2.34
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82359
Primary art unit
1633
Work group
1630
Technology center
1600
Applications
447
Granted applications
216
Examiner phone
(571) 272-2789
Supervisor
Christopher Babic
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-8507

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 31 37.5% 2.18
Group 245 37.4% 2.18
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.43 1,088 office actions across 447 applications
Applications with office actions 98.9% 442 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 5 1.1%
1 OA 164 36.7%
2 OAs 123 27.5%
3 OAs 68 15.2%
4 OAs 39 8.7%
5+ OAs 48 10.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 100.0% 2011 2012: 0.0% 2012 2013: 28.6% 2013 2014: 39.4% 2014 2015: 54.5% 2015 2016: 59.0% 2016 2017: 54.3% 2017 2018: 59.3% 2018 2019: 51.5% 2019 2020: 50.0% 2020 2021: 63.3% 2021 2022: 65.7% 2022 2023: 48.4% 2023 2024: 59.4% 2024 2025: 40.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201111100.0%
2012500.0%
2013421228.6%
2014331339.4%
2015221254.5%
2016392359.0%
2017351954.3%
2018271659.3%
2019331751.5%
2020261350.0%
2021301963.3%
2022352365.7%
2023311548.4%
2024321959.4%
2025351440.0%
20262100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 442 2.9% 10.0% 48.6% 10.4%
Action 2 278 2.5% 6.5% 66.9% 9.4%
Action 3 155 1.9% 6.5% 72.3% 8.4%
Action 4 87 2.3% 4.6% 70.1% 6.9%
Action 5 48 0.0% 4.2% 75.0% 8.3%
Action 6 31 3.2% 3.2% 71.0% 12.9%
Action 7 21 0.0% 4.8% 66.7% 14.3%
Action 8 12 0.0% 8.3% 50.0% 25.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 157 office actions
All years 2.4% 26 of 1,088 office actions
Change -2.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.2%
2.3%
2014: Alice
5.2%
1.4%
4.9%
3.5%
1.1%
2019: PEG
6.1%
0.0%
1.7%
1.5%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
11.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 16, 2021 14/896,294 Reversed §103
Jun. 11, 2019 14/787,887 Affirmed §103
Jan. 25, 2017 13/279,123 Reversed §102 · §103
Oct. 25, 2016 13/263,804 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.