Examiner Richard C Ekstrom

Grant ratio: 74.4% (88th percentile in Art Unit 1652 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.98. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: January 2023
Grant ratio 74.4%
Average office actions / grant 1.98
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
69739
Primary art unit
1652
Work group
1650
Technology center
1600
Applications
508
Granted applications
378

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 43.9% 1.73
Group 209 40.0% 2.00
Tech Center 1,380 37.5% 2.02
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.97 1,017 office actions across 517 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 517 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 210 40.6%
2 OAs 201 38.9%
3 OAs 52 10.1%
4 OAs 35 6.8%
5+ OAs 19 3.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013: 64.0% 2013 2014: 59.5% 2014 2015: 66.7% 2015 2016: 72.9% 2016 2017: 75.4% 2017 2018: 86.3% 2018 2019: 78.2% 2019 2020: 71.9% 2020 2021: 80.3% 2021 2022: 78.6% 2022 2023: 100.0% 2023

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2013251664.0%
2014422559.5%
2015513466.7%
2016483572.9%
2017614675.4%
2018514486.3%
2019554378.2%
2020574171.9%
2021614980.3%
2022564478.6%
202311100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 517 7.9% 9.3% 45.5% 10.6%
Action 2 307 6.8% 2.6% 54.7% 16.0%
Action 3 106 2.8% 0.9% 67.0% 11.3%
Action 4 54 0.0% 0.0% 75.9% 7.4%
Action 5 19 0.0% 5.3% 73.7% 5.3%
Action 6 8 12.5% 12.5% 62.5% 12.5%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 6.5% 66 of 1,017 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
1.1%
3.4%
0.0%
1.6%
9.3%
2019: PEG
8.5%
15.6%
12.1%
7.6%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
20.0% 1/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 13, 2023 16/509,700 Reversed §103
Feb. 26, 2019 13/964,548 Affirmed §103
Jan. 29, 2019 13/982,248 Affirmed §103 · §112
Oct. 13, 2017 13/833,230 Affirmed §103 · §112
May. 15, 2017 13/914,234 Affirmed in part §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.