Examiner Iqbal H Chowdhury

Grant ratio: 68.5% (79th percentile in Art Unit 1652 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.78. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: September 2026
Grant ratio 68.5%
Average office actions / grant 1.78
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81054
Primary art unit
1652
Work group
1650
Technology center
1600
Applications
1,029
Granted applications
705
Examiner phone
(571) 272-8137
Supervisor
Ram Shukla
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-0735

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 43.9% 1.73
Group 209 40.0% 2.00
Tech Center 1,380 37.5% 2.02
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.79 1,838 office actions across 1,029 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 1,025 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 4 0.4%
1 OA 548 53.3%
2 OAs 280 27.2%
3 OAs 114 11.1%
4 OAs 43 4.2%
5+ OAs 40 3.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 57.7% 2008 2009: 57.8% 2009 2010: 75.0% 2010 2011: 69.8% 2011 2012: 66.7% 2012 2013: 71.1% 2013 2014: 65.1% 2014 2015: 72.7% 2015 2016: 60.0% 2016 2017: 75.0% 2017 2018: 72.2% 2018 2019: 76.8% 2019 2020: 86.2% 2020 2021: 84.8% 2021 2022: 86.8% 2022 2023: 79.1% 2023 2024: 83.7% 2024 2025: 33.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008523057.7%
2009452657.8%
2010564275.0%
2011433069.8%
2012604066.7%
2013765471.1%
2014634165.1%
2015443272.7%
2016503060.0%
2017604575.0%
2018362672.2%
2019695376.8%
2020585086.2%
2021665684.8%
2022534686.8%
2023675379.1%
2024433683.7%
2025451533.3%
20264300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,025 0.7% 23.9% 43.5% 12.4%
Action 2 477 0.2% 19.3% 60.0% 4.6%
Action 3 197 0.5% 9.6% 70.1% 4.1%
Action 4 83 1.2% 6.0% 75.9% 4.8%
Action 5 40 2.5% 0.0% 80.0% 7.5%
Action 6 12 0.0% 8.3% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.4% 3 of 207 office actions
All years 0.6% 11 of 1,838 office actions
Change +0.9 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
1.3%
2014: Alice
1.0%
2.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
1.6%
2025: August memo
0.0%
3.9%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 5 reversed.

Full reversal rate
71.4% 5/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
71.4% 5/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
16.1 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 22, 2026 17/275,703 Affirmed §103
Mar. 6, 2020 15/101,267 Reversed §102 · §103
Jun. 19, 2019 13/116,860 Reversed New ground of rejection §103 · §112
Apr. 17, 2018 12/225,793 Reversed §103 · §112
Mar. 28, 2017 12/532,290 Affirmed §101
Sep. 15, 2011 11/763,498 Reversed §102
Sep. 1, 2010 11/079,392 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.