Examiner Allison M Fox

Grant ratio: 67.2% (91st percentile in Art Unit 1653 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.13. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 67.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.13
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80382
Primary art unit
1653
Work group
1650
Technology center
1600
Applications
689
Granted applications
463
Examiner phone
(571) 272-2936
Supervisor
Christopher Babic
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-8507

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 28.7% 2.39
Group 208 40.4% 2.00
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.04 1,407 office actions across 689 applications
Applications with office actions 98.1% 676 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 13 1.9%
1 OA 320 46.4%
2 OAs 186 27.0%
3 OAs 84 12.2%
4 OAs 39 5.7%
5+ OAs 47 6.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 100.0% 2009 2010: 50.0% 2010 2011: 64.5% 2011 2012: 66.0% 2012 2013: 75.0% 2013 2014: 75.5% 2014 2015: 80.6% 2015 2016: 74.6% 2016 2017: 67.2% 2017 2018: 73.9% 2018 2019: 69.6% 2019 2020: 69.4% 2020 2021: 83.7% 2021 2022: 72.4% 2022 2023: 70.6% 2023 2024: 70.0% 2024 2025: 33.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200911100.0%
20102150.0%
2011312064.5%
2012533566.0%
2013523975.0%
2014534075.5%
2015362980.6%
2016675074.6%
2017583967.2%
2018463473.9%
2019463269.6%
2020493469.4%
2021494183.7%
2022292172.4%
2023342470.6%
2024201470.0%
202527933.3%
20263600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 676 0.9% 12.0% 37.1% 7.7%
Action 2 356 2.0% 9.8% 41.3% 12.6%
Action 3 170 4.1% 10.6% 44.1% 14.7%
Action 4 86 5.8% 14.0% 46.5% 10.5%
Action 5 47 6.4% 6.4% 53.2% 10.6%
Action 6 30 0.0% 16.7% 43.3% 20.0%
Action 7 17 5.9% 17.6% 41.2% 11.8%
Action 8 11 0.0% 36.4% 36.4% 18.2%
Action 9 7 14.3% 14.3% 42.9% 28.6%
Action 10 4 25.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.2% 3 of 138 office actions
All years 2.2% 31 of 1,407 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
2014: Alice
7.7%
3.0%
1.4%
4.0%
1.8%
2019: PEG
3.2%
1.0%
3.7%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
5.3%
2025: August memo
0.0%
2.4%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
14.3% 1/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
10.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 10, 2026 16/661,889 Affirmed §100 · §103
Dec. 17, 2021 14/706,165 Affirmed §103
Dec. 16, 2021 15/444,445 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Dec. 2, 2021 15/195,748 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jan. 2, 2020 14/553,869 Reversed §102
Mar. 26, 2019 14/540,563 Affirmed §102 · §103
Dec. 29, 2016 10/874,402 Affirmed §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.