Examiner Rosanne Kosson

Grant ratio: 74.8% (94th percentile in Art Unit 1657 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.62. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: October 2025
Grant ratio 74.8%
Average office actions / grant 1.62
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80342
Primary art unit
1657
Work group
1650
Technology center
1600
Applications
779
Granted applications
583

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 35 46.3% 2.07
Group 208 40.4% 2.00
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.67 1,304 office actions across 783 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 783 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 468 59.8%
2 OAs 215 27.5%
3 OAs 44 5.6%
4 OAs 27 3.4%
5+ OAs 29 3.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 35.0% 2008 2009: 54.4% 2009 2010: 47.9% 2010 2011: 81.5% 2011 2012: 83.3% 2012 2013: 76.6% 2013 2014: 86.7% 2014 2015: 82.5% 2015 2016: 86.3% 2016 2017: 78.7% 2017 2018: 90.2% 2018 2019: 83.8% 2019 2020: 82.5% 2020 2021: 88.5% 2021 2022: 84.0% 2022 2023: 88.4% 2023 2024: 82.9% 2024 2025: 34.3% 2025

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008401435.0%
2009573154.4%
2010482347.9%
2011544481.5%
2012484083.3%
2013473676.6%
2014453986.7%
2015403382.5%
2016514486.3%
2017473778.7%
2018615590.2%
2019373183.8%
2020403382.5%
2021262388.5%
2022252184.0%
2023433888.4%
2024352982.9%
2025351234.3%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 783 0.5% 6.9% 41.5% 11.4%
Action 2 315 1.6% 3.8% 47.3% 16.2%
Action 3 100 1.0% 4.0% 51.0% 17.0%
Action 4 56 1.8% 5.4% 51.8% 14.3%
Action 5 29 0.0% 3.4% 44.8% 17.2%
Action 6 14 0.0% 7.1% 57.1% 7.1%
Action 7 6 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 114 office actions
All years 0.8% 11 of 1,304 office actions
Change -0.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.9%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
0.0%
2014: Alice
4.2%
1.6%
1.4%
1.5%
1.3%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
20.0% 1/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
20.0% 1/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
10.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 28, 2015 11/589,371 Reversed N/A
May. 4, 2012 10/816,099 Affirmed §103
Nov. 2, 2011 10/840,354 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 25, 2011 11/447,455 Affirmed §103
Apr. 22, 2010 11/255,279 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.