Examiner Thane Underdahl

Grant ratio: 51.5% (46th percentile in Art Unit 1657 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.82. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 51.5%
Average office actions / grant 1.82
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82311
Primary art unit
1657
Work group
1650
Technology center
1600
Applications
585
Granted applications
301
Examiner phone
(303) 297-4299
Supervisor
Louise Humphrey
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-5543

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 35 46.3% 2.07
Group 208 40.4% 2.00
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.87 1,095 office actions across 585 applications
Applications with office actions 97.6% 571 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 14 2.4%
1 OA 285 48.7%
2 OAs 165 28.2%
3 OAs 61 10.4%
4 OAs 31 5.3%
5+ OAs 29 5.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 20.0% 2008 2011: 45.5% 2011 2012: 58.8% 2012 2013: 57.9% 2013 2014: 43.9% 2014 2015: 35.7% 2015 2016: 50.0% 2016 2017: 47.5% 2017 2018: 57.5% 2018 2019: 65.0% 2019 2020: 67.4% 2020 2021: 73.1% 2021 2022: 82.1% 2022 2023: 84.0% 2023 2024: 65.5% 2024 2025: 27.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20085120.0%
2011331545.5%
2012342058.8%
2013382257.9%
2014572543.9%
2015281035.7%
2016381950.0%
2017401947.5%
2018402357.5%
2019402665.0%
2020432967.4%
2021261973.1%
2022282382.1%
2023252184.0%
2024291965.5%
2025361027.8%
20264500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 571 2.5% 16.8% 53.4% 10.0%
Action 2 286 2.4% 5.6% 62.6% 12.2%
Action 3 121 1.7% 2.5% 66.9% 9.1%
Action 4 60 3.3% 1.7% 75.0% 5.0%
Action 5 29 10.3% 0.0% 75.9% 0.0%
Action 6 17 5.9% 0.0% 58.8% 0.0%
Action 7 7 0.0% 0.0% 71.4% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.6% 1 of 169 office actions
All years 2.6% 29 of 1,095 office actions
Change -2.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
3.1%
7.9%
5.4%
3.4%
6.1%
2019: PEG
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
9.8%
5.1%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
2.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
24.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 19, 2018 12/705,682 Affirmed §103
Nov. 17, 2016 12/083,228 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §112
Nov. 23, 2015 12/724,747 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 2, 2015 10/275,698 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.