Examiner Karen Redden

Grant ratio: 86.9% (32nd percentile in Art Unit 1661 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.17. Most common rejection type: §112.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 86.9%
Average office actions / grant 1.17
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
91732
Primary art unit
1661
Work group
1660
Technology center
1600
Applications
672
Granted applications
584
Examiner phone
(571) 270-0298
Supervisor
Bratislav Stankovic
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-0305

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 11 88.1% 1.12
Group 57 59.1% 1.46
Tech Center 1,380 37.5% 2.02
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.34 898 office actions across 672 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 669 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.4%
1 OA 567 84.4%
2 OAs 58 8.6%
3 OAs 15 2.2%
4 OAs 12 1.8%
5+ OAs 17 2.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2015: 72.0% 2015 2016: 87.7% 2016 2017: 93.3% 2017 2018: 87.7% 2018 2019: 92.0% 2019 2020: 95.1% 2020 2021: 94.7% 2021 2022: 87.9% 2022 2023: 87.8% 2023 2024: 80.4% 2024 2025: 77.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2015503672.0%
2016736487.7%
2017908493.3%
2018575087.7%
2019878092.0%
2020827895.1%
2021575494.7%
2022585187.9%
2023494387.8%
2024463780.4%
20259777.8%
20261400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 669 0.0% 30.5% 7.6% 57.2%
Action 2 102 1.0% 16.7% 39.2% 29.4%
Action 3 44 0.0% 2.3% 72.7% 9.1%
Action 4 29 0.0% 3.4% 62.1% 10.3%
Action 5 17 0.0% 0.0% 64.7% 0.0%
Action 6 13 0.0% 0.0% 61.5% 0.0%
Action 7 10 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 0.0%
Action 8 6 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 112 office actions
All years 0.1% 1 of 898 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 2. Merits outcomes: 0 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
100.0% 2/2 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
100.0% 2/2 decisions
Median appeal duration
8.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 20, 2020 15/330,732 Reversed N/A
Aug. 20, 2020 15/330,734 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.