Examiner David H. Kruse, Ph.D

Grant ratio: 77.6% (77th percentile in Art Unit 1663 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.49. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 77.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.49
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
77943
Primary art unit
1663
Work group
1660
Technology center
1600
Applications
1,404
Granted applications
1,089
Examiner phone
(571) 272-0799
Supervisor
Amjad Abraham
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-7058

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 25 52.2% 1.49
Group 57 59.1% 1.46
Tech Center 1,380 37.5% 2.02
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.57 2,207 office actions across 1,404 applications
Applications with office actions 99.2% 1,393 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 11 0.8%
1 OA 906 64.5%
2 OAs 334 23.8%
3 OAs 67 4.8%
4 OAs 48 3.4%
5+ OAs 38 2.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 79.7% 2008 2009: 80.0% 2009 2010: 88.5% 2010 2011: 65.3% 2011 2012: 86.0% 2012 2013: 86.2% 2013 2014: 80.6% 2014 2015: 71.0% 2015 2016: 82.5% 2016 2017: 88.5% 2017 2018: 88.9% 2018 2019: 81.6% 2019 2020: 74.7% 2020 2021: 86.7% 2021 2022: 83.8% 2022 2023: 79.7% 2023 2024: 86.7% 2024 2025: 33.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008594779.7%
2009554480.0%
2010968588.5%
2011724765.3%
2012938086.0%
2013585086.2%
2014725880.6%
2015694971.0%
2016806682.5%
2017877788.5%
2018908088.9%
2019766281.6%
2020755674.7%
2021907886.7%
2022806783.8%
2023745979.7%
2024756586.7%
2025571933.3%
20264600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,393 0.6% 10.1% 31.7% 41.9%
Action 2 487 1.6% 9.7% 44.8% 27.7%
Action 3 153 3.9% 9.8% 60.1% 17.0%
Action 4 86 1.2% 10.5% 58.1% 17.4%
Action 5 38 0.0% 7.9% 68.4% 5.3%
Action 6 22 0.0% 9.1% 50.0% 22.7%
Action 7 12 0.0% 16.7% 50.0% 16.7%
Action 8 7 0.0% 14.3% 42.9% 14.3%
Action 9 6 0.0% 16.7% 33.3% 33.3%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.4% 1 of 268 office actions
All years 1.1% 24 of 2,207 office actions
Change -0.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
0.0%
0.7%
2.7%
2014: Alice
1.6%
1.6%
1.6%
2.1%
2.3%
2019: PEG
0.0%
2.4%
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
1.2%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
57.1% 4/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
57.1% 4/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
23.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 15, 2020 14/996,093 Affirmed §103
Apr. 16, 2020 14/931,601 Reversed §112
Oct. 29, 2019 12/245,610 Affirmed §103
Jan. 11, 2018 11/941,666 Reversed §101 · §103 · §112
Jul. 31, 2017 12/876,291 Affirmed §102
Jun. 8, 2015 10/639,751 Reversed N/A
Sep. 7, 2010 10/332,494 Reversed §102

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.