Examiner Jennifer Cho Sawyer

Grant ratio: 59.6% (68th percentile in Art Unit 1671 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.81. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 59.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.81
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82947
Primary art unit
1671
Work group
1620
Technology center
1600
Applications
609
Granted applications
363
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1690

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 15 32.5% 1.60
Group 252 46.0% 1.76
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.85 1,128 office actions across 609 applications
Applications with office actions 99.7% 607 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.3%
1 OA 285 46.8%
2 OAs 204 33.5%
3 OAs 65 10.7%
4 OAs 34 5.6%
5+ OAs 19 3.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 80.0% 2008 2010: 55.6% 2010 2011: 63.5% 2011 2012: 71.1% 2012 2013: 63.3% 2013 2014: 54.8% 2014 2015: 71.4% 2015 2016: 78.9% 2016 2017: 65.8% 2017 2018: 54.2% 2018 2019: 81.8% 2019 2020: 77.4% 2020 2021: 84.4% 2021 2022: 72.2% 2022 2023: 70.3% 2023 2024: 61.3% 2024 2025: 28.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20085480.0%
20109555.6%
2011634063.5%
2012453271.1%
2013493163.3%
2014422354.8%
2015352571.4%
2016191578.9%
2017382565.8%
2018241354.2%
2019221881.8%
2020312477.4%
2021322784.4%
2022362672.2%
2023372670.3%
2024311961.3%
2025351028.6%
20265600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 607 0.5% 10.0% 61.8% 9.7%
Action 2 322 0.0% 8.4% 70.5% 7.1%
Action 3 118 0.0% 8.5% 72.9% 8.5%
Action 4 53 0.0% 0.0% 88.7% 3.8%
Action 5 19 0.0% 0.0% 78.9% 5.3%
Action 6 7 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 14.3%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 200 office actions
All years 0.3% 3 of 1,128 office actions
Change -0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

14.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 11. Merits outcomes: 9 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
18.2% 2/11 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
18.2% 2/11 decisions
Median appeal duration
32.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 4, 2025 17/314,748 Affirmed §103
Nov. 13, 2017 12/663,028 Affirmed §103 · §112
Dec. 19, 2016 12/307,472 Affirmed §103
Mar. 23, 2016 12/920,703 Reversed N/A
Nov. 30, 2015 12/515,554 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 17, 2015 12/291,774 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 2, 2015 12/636,850 Affirmed N/A
Jun. 9, 2015 12/765,953 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 16, 2015 12/448,003 Reversed §103
Dec. 12, 2014 12/632,117 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 10, 2014 12/471,528 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.