Examiner Noble Jarrell

Grant ratio: 73.2% (50th percentile in Art Unit 1699 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.71. Most common rejection type: §112.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 73.2%
Average office actions / grant 1.71
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80220
Primary art unit
1699
Work group
1620
Technology center
1600
Applications
1,096
Granted applications
802
Examiner phone
(571) 272-9077
Supervisor
Fereydoun Sajjadi
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3311

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 1 73.2% 1.71
Group 252 46.0% 1.76
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.69 1,849 office actions across 1,096 applications
Applications with office actions 99.5% 1,090 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 6 0.5%
1 OA 607 55.4%
2 OAs 326 29.7%
3 OAs 84 7.7%
4 OAs 45 4.1%
5+ OAs 28 2.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 60.0% 2007 2008: 64.7% 2008 2009: 71.3% 2009 2010: 75.3% 2010 2011: 81.3% 2011 2012: 83.0% 2012 2013: 75.8% 2013 2014: 84.2% 2014 2015: 86.7% 2015 2016: 86.7% 2016 2017: 85.7% 2017 2018: 88.9% 2018 2019: 86.8% 2019 2020: 87.2% 2020 2021: 93.9% 2021 2022: 76.7% 2022 2023: 89.2% 2023 2024: 86.0% 2024 2025: 32.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20075360.0%
2008684464.7%
2009946771.3%
2010735575.3%
2011806581.3%
2012534483.0%
2013624775.8%
2014383284.2%
2015302686.7%
2016302686.7%
2017494285.7%
2018454088.9%
2019685986.8%
2020786887.2%
2021666293.9%
2022433376.7%
2023373389.2%
2024433786.0%
2025591932.2%
20267500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,090 1.8% 19.4% 20.6% 31.6%
Action 2 483 0.4% 17.2% 21.5% 36.4%
Action 3 157 0.0% 21.0% 29.9% 27.4%
Action 4 73 0.0% 20.5% 24.7% 34.2%
Action 5 28 0.0% 10.7% 28.6% 28.6%
Action 6 15 0.0% 6.7% 33.3% 26.7%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 275 office actions
All years 1.2% 22 of 1,849 office actions
Change -1.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
3.0%
0.6%
1.7%
1.6%
2.2%
1.0%
2014: Alice
5.9%
1.8%
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
1.6%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 2. Merits outcomes: 0 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
100.0% 2/2 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
100.0% 2/2 decisions
Median appeal duration
38.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 24, 2015 11/085,193 Reversed §103
Apr. 6, 2015 11/707,248 Reversed §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.