Examiner Russell Kemmerle Iii

Grant ratio: 57.5% (50th percentile in Art Unit 1741 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.25. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: September 2016
Grant ratio 57.5%
Average office actions / grant 2.25
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82970
Primary art unit
1741
Work group
1740
Technology center
1700
Applications
438
Granted applications
252

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 28 52.0% 2.01
Group 211 48.8% 2.05
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.28 1,001 office actions across 439 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 439 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 162 36.9%
2 OAs 146 33.3%
3 OAs 52 11.8%
4 OAs 43 9.8%
5+ OAs 36 8.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 62.5% 2008 2009: 44.9% 2009 2010: 43.9% 2010 2011: 51.6% 2011 2012: 48.5% 2012 2013: 64.4% 2013 2014: 81.1% 2014 2015: 68.9% 2015 2016: 40.0% 2016

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008483062.5%
2009492244.9%
2010411843.9%
2011623251.6%
2012663248.5%
2013593864.4%
2014534381.1%
2015453168.9%
201615640.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 439 0.7% 5.2% 86.8% 4.1%
Action 2 277 0.0% 2.2% 91.7% 4.7%
Action 3 131 0.0% 1.5% 93.1% 4.6%
Action 4 79 0.0% 2.5% 91.1% 5.1%
Action 5 36 0.0% 0.0% 97.2% 2.8%
Action 6 21 0.0% 0.0% 95.2% 0.0%
Action 7 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.3% 3 of 1,001 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.7%
0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.6%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 33. Merits outcomes: 10 affirmed, 4 affirmed in part, and 19 reversed.

Full reversal rate
57.6% 19/33 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
69.7% 23/33 decisions
Median appeal duration
21.0 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 25, 2016 13/128,280 Reversed §103
Apr. 29, 2016 12/063,266 Affirmed in part §103
Apr. 19, 2016 12/844,250 Affirmed §103 · §112
Mar. 31, 2016 13/435,762 Reversed §103
Mar. 31, 2016 12/798,660 Affirmed §103
Oct. 29, 2015 12/789,945 Reversed N/A
Sep. 10, 2015 12/533,706 Reversed N/A
Jun. 30, 2015 12/270,092 Reversed N/A
Jun. 3, 2015 12/323,809 Affirmed N/A
May. 29, 2015 12/629,641 Reversed N/A
May. 15, 2015 12/393,538 Affirmed in part N/A
Sep. 4, 2014 12/212,452 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.