Examiner Patrick Butler

Grant ratio: 32.4% (20th percentile in Art Unit 1742 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.00. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: April 2020
Grant ratio 32.4%
Average office actions / grant 3.00
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80871
Primary art unit
1742
Work group
1740
Technology center
1700
Applications
250
Granted applications
81

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 26 52.6% 2.07
Group 211 48.8% 2.05
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.88 777 office actions across 270 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 270 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 80 29.6%
2 OAs 71 26.3%
3 OAs 43 15.9%
4 OAs 28 10.4%
5+ OAs 48 17.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 12.5% 2008 2009: 47.8% 2009 2010: 36.8% 2010 2011: 38.1% 2011 2012: 36.4% 2012 2013: 31.6% 2013 2014: 18.8% 2014 2015: 23.5% 2015 2016: 25.0% 2016 2017: 29.2% 2017 2018: 30.8% 2018 2019: 60.0% 2019 2020: 25.0% 2020

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200824312.5%
2009231147.8%
201019736.8%
201121838.1%
201222836.4%
201319631.6%
201416318.8%
201517423.5%
201628725.0%
201724729.2%
201813430.8%
2019201260.0%
20204125.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 270 0.4% 7.0% 88.9% 3.7%
Action 2 190 0.0% 5.3% 87.9% 6.3%
Action 3 119 0.0% 3.4% 91.6% 5.0%
Action 4 76 0.0% 5.3% 86.8% 7.9%
Action 5 48 0.0% 2.1% 91.7% 6.3%
Action 6 30 0.0% 3.3% 93.3% 3.3%
Action 7 18 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 11 0.0% 0.0% 90.9% 9.1%
Action 9 8 0.0% 0.0% 87.5% 12.5%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.1% 1 of 777 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 13. Merits outcomes: 8 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
23.1% 3/13 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
38.5% 5/13 decisions
Median appeal duration
18.2 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 26, 2021 13/133,555 Reversed §112
Jun. 15, 2020 12/727,063 Affirmed §103
Mar. 29, 2017 12/928,273 Affirmed §103
Aug. 8, 2016 12/086,272 Affirmed §103
Mar. 15, 2016 12/401,172 Affirmed §103
Sep. 9, 2013 10/662,492 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 26, 2013 10/239,130 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jan. 14, 2013 11/142,044 Affirmed New ground of rejection §103 · §112
Jun. 28, 2012 10/694,153 Affirmed in part N/A
Oct. 26, 2011 10/695,252 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 14, 2011 10/039,064 Affirmed in part N/A
Jun. 14, 2011 10/656,057 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.