Examiner Stella Yi

Grant ratio: 65.5% (76th percentile in Art Unit 1742 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.19. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 65.5%
Average office actions / grant 2.19
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84443
Primary art unit
1742
Work group
1740
Technology center
1700
Applications
993
Granted applications
650
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5123
Supervisor
Christina Johnson
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-1176

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 26 52.6% 2.07
Group 211 48.8% 2.05
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.17 2,157 office actions across 993 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 989 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 4 0.4%
1 OA 455 45.8%
2 OAs 260 26.2%
3 OAs 95 9.6%
4 OAs 97 9.8%
5+ OAs 82 8.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 0.0% 2007 2008: 6.5% 2008 2009: 19.1% 2009 2010: 36.1% 2010 2011: 35.7% 2011 2012: 58.7% 2012 2013: 43.8% 2013 2014: 78.5% 2014 2015: 78.1% 2015 2016: 83.8% 2016 2017: 84.3% 2017 2018: 83.9% 2018 2019: 85.9% 2019 2020: 84.6% 2020 2021: 82.5% 2021 2022: 85.5% 2022 2023: 91.2% 2023 2024: 82.7% 2024 2025: 43.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2007200.0%
20083126.5%
200947919.1%
2010361336.1%
2011421535.7%
2012462758.7%
2013482143.8%
2014796278.5%
2015645078.1%
2016746283.8%
2017514384.3%
2018564783.9%
2019645585.9%
2020524484.6%
2021403382.5%
2022554785.5%
2023575291.2%
2024524382.7%
2025572543.9%
20264000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 989 0.2% 23.2% 62.3% 2.8%
Action 2 534 0.2% 14.6% 74.9% 1.9%
Action 3 274 0.4% 10.6% 82.8% 2.2%
Action 4 179 0.0% 6.1% 85.5% 1.1%
Action 5 82 0.0% 7.3% 85.4% 1.2%
Action 6 51 0.0% 9.8% 80.4% 0.0%
Action 7 22 0.0% 9.1% 86.4% 4.5%
Action 8 12 0.0% 25.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 9 7 0.0% 28.6% 71.4% 0.0%
Action 10 6 0.0% 16.7% 83.3% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 218 office actions
All years 0.2% 4 of 2,157 office actions
Change -0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
66.7% 2/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 2/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
13.6 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 5, 2013 11/547,673 Reversed N/A
Apr. 26, 2012 10/577,181 Reversed N/A
Oct. 27, 2011 11/446,363 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.