AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Benjamin Schiffman

Examiner Benjamin Schiffman appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 60.8%, they average 2.01 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO About Average
Average OA / Grant 2.01
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-7626
Predicted Supervisor
Christina Johnson
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-1176
Tech Center
1700 - Chemical and Materials Engineering
Group
1740 - Tires, Adhesive Bonding, Glass/Paper Making, Plastics Shaping and Molding

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
929
Granted Applications
565
Non-Granted Applications
364
Avg OA / Grant
2.01
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
1742 , 1791
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 60.8% 2.01
Art Unit 25 55.7% 2.07
Group 195 53.9% 2.05
Tech Center 1,713 47.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 3 1 33.3%
2009 46 12 26.1%
2010 67 34 50.7%
2011 42 23 54.8%
2012 58 33 56.9%
2013 59 31 52.5%
2014 27 18 66.7%
2015 51 32 62.7%
2016 62 32 51.6%
2017 63 52 82.5%
2018 45 31 68.9%
2019 50 40 80.0%
2020 44 33 75.0%
2021 62 42 67.7%
2022 55 40 72.7%
2023 63 51 81.0%
2024 50 35 70.0%
2025 64 25 39.1%
2026 18 0 0.0%

565 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 929 0.0% 17.7% 81.3% 0.8%
2 538 0.4% 15.8% 79.9% 2.2%
3 236 0.0% 10.6% 85.6% 2.1%
4 116 0.9% 6.9% 85.3% 4.3%
5 35 0.0% 5.7% 88.6% 5.7%
6 20 0.0% 0.0% 90.0% 10.0%
7 7 0.0% 28.6% 71.4% 0.0%
8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2008
0.0%
2009
0.0%
2010
0.9%
2011
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
0.0%
2017
1.3%
2018
1.1%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
0.0%
2024
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.