Examiner Alison Hindenlang

Grant ratio: 61.2% (64th percentile in Art Unit 1744 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.23. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: November 2023
Grant ratio 61.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.23
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85519
Primary art unit
1744
Work group
1740
Technology center
1700
Applications
420
Granted applications
257

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 48.0% 2.05
Group 211 48.8% 2.05
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.26 966 office actions across 427 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 427 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 167 39.1%
2 OAs 140 32.8%
3 OAs 51 11.9%
4 OAs 34 8.0%
5+ OAs 35 8.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 0.0% 2008 2009: 38.2% 2009 2010: 57.9% 2010 2011: 47.3% 2011 2012: 69.2% 2012 2013: 75.8% 2013 2014: 71.7% 2014 2015: 72.4% 2015 2016: 47.6% 2016 2017: 61.5% 2017 2021: 46.2% 2021 2022: 63.2% 2022 2023: 87.5% 2023

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008400.0%
2009341338.2%
2010573357.9%
2011552647.3%
2012523669.2%
2013624775.8%
2014533871.7%
2015292172.4%
2016211047.6%
201713861.5%
202113646.2%
2022191263.2%
20238787.5%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 427 0.5% 2.8% 91.1% 2.3%
Action 2 260 0.4% 1.9% 91.9% 3.5%
Action 3 120 0.8% 1.7% 91.7% 1.7%
Action 4 69 0.0% 2.9% 92.8% 4.3%
Action 5 35 0.0% 2.9% 88.6% 8.6%
Action 6 26 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 3 office actions
All years 0.4% 4 of 966 office actions
Change -0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
2.3%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
3.2%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 16. Merits outcomes: 8 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 7 reversed.

Full reversal rate
43.8% 7/16 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 8/16 decisions
Median appeal duration
22.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 14, 2016 12/061,145 Reversed §103 · §112
Jun. 28, 2016 13/652,720 Reversed §103 · §112
May. 23, 2016 12/952,635 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 30, 2016 12/071,061 Reversed §103 · §112
Mar. 18, 2016 11/468,090 Reversed §103 · §112
Feb. 29, 2016 12/511,193 Reversed §103
Dec. 16, 2015 12/091,672 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 6, 2015 12/854,832 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 1, 2015 12/615,541 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 7, 2015 11/201,410 Affirmed in part §103
Oct. 31, 2013 11/496,238 Affirmed §103
Sep. 17, 2013 12/349,204 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.