Examiner Sing P. Chan

Grant ratio: 76.5% (93rd percentile in Art Unit 1745 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.51. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: July 2020
Grant ratio 76.5%
Average office actions / grant 1.51
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78991
Primary art unit
1745
Work group
1740
Technology center
1700
Applications
737
Granted applications
564

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 51.9% 2.06
Group 214 47.7% 2.05
Tech Center 1,810 43.6% 2.14
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.57 1,157 office actions across 738 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 738 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 477 64.6%
2 OAs 175 23.7%
3 OAs 46 6.2%
4 OAs 27 3.7%
5+ OAs 13 1.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 55.8% 2008 2009: 64.7% 2009 2010: 71.4% 2010 2011: 70.5% 2011 2012: 65.6% 2012 2013: 78.1% 2013 2014: 75.8% 2014 2015: 90.0% 2015 2016: 78.8% 2016 2017: 88.5% 2017 2018: 86.6% 2018 2019: 84.8% 2019 2020: 94.7% 2020

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008522955.8%
2009513364.7%
2010634571.4%
2011614370.5%
2012614065.6%
2013645078.1%
2014624775.8%
2015504590.0%
2016806378.8%
2017615488.5%
2018675886.6%
2019463984.8%
2020191894.7%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 738 0.4% 3.8% 60.7% 18.4%
Action 2 261 0.8% 9.6% 67.0% 9.6%
Action 3 86 0.0% 9.3% 77.9% 7.0%
Action 4 40 0.0% 2.5% 80.0% 17.5%
Action 5 13 0.0% 7.7% 92.3% 0.0%
Action 6 9 0.0% 11.1% 88.9% 0.0%
Action 7 6 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 16.7%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 66.7%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.4% 5 of 1,157 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
1.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
2.4%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 8 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
11.1% 1/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
11.1% 1/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
17.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 23, 2015 11/960,575 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 21, 2013 11/470,069 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 16, 2012 11/613,625 Affirmed §103
Apr. 26, 2012 11/325,519 Affirmed N/A
Jan. 23, 2012 10/394,526 Affirmed N/A
Jun. 2, 2011 11/182,422 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 22, 2010 11/206,912 Reversed N/A
Mar. 31, 2010 11/024,212 Affirmed §103
Jan. 22, 2010 10/938,833 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.