Examiner Jaeyun Lee

Grant ratio: 60.7% (50th percentile in Art Unit 1746 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.00. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: September 2022
Grant ratio 60.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.00
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84430
Primary art unit
1746
Work group
1740
Technology center
1700
Applications
272
Granted applications
165

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 52.4% 2.01
Group 211 48.8% 2.05
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.03 567 office actions across 280 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 280 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 144 51.4%
2 OAs 69 24.6%
3 OAs 26 9.3%
4 OAs 20 7.1%
5+ OAs 21 7.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 50.0% 2008 2009: 36.4% 2009 2010: 50.0% 2010 2011: 70.6% 2011 2012: 82.4% 2012 2013: 42.9% 2013 2014: 71.4% 2014 2015: 60.0% 2015 2016: 81.3% 2016 2017: 73.7% 2017 2018: 60.0% 2018 2019: 65.0% 2019 2020: 58.3% 2020 2021: 68.8% 2021 2022: 80.0% 2022

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200818950.0%
2009331236.4%
2010201050.0%
2011171270.6%
2012171482.4%
201321942.9%
2014211571.4%
20155360.0%
2016161381.3%
2017191473.7%
2018201260.0%
2019201365.0%
2020241458.3%
2021161168.8%
20225480.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 280 0.0% 3.6% 88.9% 3.6%
Action 2 136 0.0% 4.4% 91.2% 2.9%
Action 3 67 0.0% 1.5% 89.6% 7.5%
Action 4 41 0.0% 0.0% 95.1% 4.9%
Action 5 21 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 567 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 4/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
16.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 3, 2019 14/485,885 Reversed §103
Feb. 7, 2019 14/366,055 Reversed §103
Sep. 29, 2017 12/358,798 Affirmed §103
Jun. 15, 2016 13/761,785 Affirmed in part §103
Aug. 22, 2012 11/736,930 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 30, 2012 11/228,445 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.