Examiner Elizabeth Royston

Grant ratio: 41.3% (7th percentile in Art Unit 1746 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.58. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: January 2022
Grant ratio 41.3%
Average office actions / grant 2.58
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86477
Primary art unit
1746
Work group
1740
Technology center
1700
Applications
356
Granted applications
147

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 52.4% 2.01
Group 211 48.8% 2.05
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.51 928 office actions across 369 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 369 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 105 28.5%
2 OAs 125 33.9%
3 OAs 59 16.0%
4 OAs 42 11.4%
5+ OAs 38 10.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 9.1% 2009 2010: 52.5% 2010 2011: 48.7% 2011 2012: 41.2% 2012 2013: 55.6% 2013 2014: 28.6% 2014 2015: 20.0% 2015 2016: 39.1% 2016 2017: 38.5% 2017 2018: 45.7% 2018 2019: 29.4% 2019 2020: 62.1% 2020 2021: 12.5% 2021 2022: 100.0% 2022

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20092229.1%
2010402152.5%
2011391948.7%
2012341441.2%
2013362055.6%
201421628.6%
201525520.0%
201623939.1%
2017261038.5%
2018351645.7%
201917529.4%
2020291862.1%
20218112.5%
202211100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 369 0.0% 5.4% 91.6% 2.2%
Action 2 264 0.4% 2.3% 95.1% 1.9%
Action 3 139 0.0% 1.4% 93.5% 4.3%
Action 4 80 0.0% 1.3% 92.5% 6.3%
Action 5 38 0.0% 0.0% 89.5% 10.5%
Action 6 20 0.0% 0.0% 95.0% 5.0%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 6 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 16.7%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.1% 1 of 928 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
22.2% 2/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 3/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 30, 2022 15/405,483 Reversed §103
Mar. 11, 2022 14/550,380 Affirmed §103
Feb. 14, 2019 13/517,927 Affirmed §103
Sep. 24, 2018 13/250,666 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112
Jun. 26, 2018 13/845,978 Reversed §103
May. 17, 2016 12/509,948 Affirmed §103
Dec. 28, 2015 11/978,463 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 24, 2015 12/056,103 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 27, 2015 12/330,882 Affirmed §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.