Examiner Martin Rogers

Grant ratio: 30.2% (30th percentile in Art Unit 1747 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.65. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: September 2018
Grant ratio 30.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.65
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85568
Primary art unit
1747
Work group
1740
Technology center
1700
Applications
430
Granted applications
130

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 31 37.6% 2.24
Group 211 48.8% 2.05
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.77 1,278 office actions across 462 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 462 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 103 22.3%
2 OAs 170 36.8%
3 OAs 60 13.0%
4 OAs 70 15.2%
5+ OAs 59 12.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 14.3% 2008 2009: 8.6% 2009 2010: 25.0% 2010 2011: 28.6% 2011 2012: 27.6% 2012 2013: 33.3% 2013 2014: 43.2% 2014 2015: 31.6% 2015 2016: 31.9% 2016 2017: 51.4% 2017 2018: 44.4% 2018

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20087114.3%
20095858.6%
201036925.0%
2011421228.6%
2012581627.6%
2013541833.3%
2014441943.2%
2015381231.6%
2016471531.9%
2017371951.4%
20189444.4%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 462 0.9% 2.6% 80.7% 4.1%
Action 2 359 0.0% 6.1% 78.3% 7.0%
Action 3 189 0.0% 1.6% 79.9% 6.9%
Action 4 129 0.0% 0.8% 74.4% 14.0%
Action 5 59 0.0% 0.0% 79.7% 5.1%
Action 6 41 0.0% 0.0% 70.7% 14.6%
Action 7 17 0.0% 0.0% 70.6% 5.9%
Action 8 10 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 10.0%
Action 9 5 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 20.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.3% 4 of 1,278 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 34. Merits outcomes: 22 affirmed, 5 affirmed in part, and 7 reversed.

Full reversal rate
20.6% 7/34 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
35.3% 12/34 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.1 months
New grounds of rejection
3
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 30, 2019 12/527,699 Affirmed New ground of rejection §102 · §112
Dec. 17, 2018 14/338,096 Affirmed New ground of rejection §103 · §112
Oct. 31, 2018 13/585,904 Affirmed in part §112
Oct. 24, 2018 13/771,410 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112
Jun. 19, 2018 14/192,017 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jan. 30, 2018 12/744,063 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Nov. 15, 2017 12/435,911 Affirmed §102 · §103
Mar. 29, 2017 12/950,327 Affirmed §103 · §112
Mar. 7, 2017 12/950,403 Reversed §103
Feb. 23, 2017 13/062,946 Affirmed §103 · §112
Dec. 16, 2016 13/944,661 Affirmed §103
Sep. 22, 2016 10/501,591 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.