Examiner Sonji Turner

Grant ratio: 67.8% (52nd percentile in Art Unit 1776 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.53. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 67.8%
Average office actions / grant 1.53
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82657
Primary art unit
1776
Work group
1770
Technology center
1700
Applications
696
Granted applications
472
Examiner phone
(571) 272-1203
Supervisor
Jennifer Dieterle
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-7872

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 59.1% 1.68
Group 179 50.3% 1.94
Tech Center 1,816 43.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.59 1,109 office actions across 696 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 696 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 439 63.1%
2 OAs 173 24.9%
3 OAs 47 6.8%
4 OAs 20 2.9%
5+ OAs 17 2.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 65.8% 2008 2009: 74.2% 2009 2010: 76.7% 2010 2011: 62.5% 2011 2012: 71.1% 2012 2013: 67.5% 2013 2014: 74.3% 2014 2015: 85.7% 2015 2016: 71.7% 2016 2017: 65.9% 2017 2018: 83.3% 2018 2019: 82.1% 2019 2020: 86.4% 2020 2021: 81.8% 2021 2022: 92.9% 2022 2023: 67.4% 2023 2024: 77.8% 2024 2025: 28.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008382565.8%
2009312374.2%
2010433376.7%
2011322062.5%
2012382771.1%
2013402767.5%
2014352674.3%
2015282485.7%
2016463371.7%
2017412765.9%
2018302583.3%
2019282382.1%
2020443886.4%
2021332781.8%
2022282692.9%
2023463167.4%
2024362877.8%
202532928.1%
20264700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 696 0.6% 10.8% 69.8% 13.4%
Action 2 257 0.8% 10.9% 58.0% 26.8%
Action 3 84 1.2% 13.1% 71.4% 11.9%
Action 4 37 2.7% 8.1% 75.7% 10.8%
Action 5 17 5.9% 0.0% 88.2% 5.9%
Action 6 8 12.5% 12.5% 50.0% 25.0%
Action 7 6 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 83.3%
Action 8 3 0.0% 33.3% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 191 office actions
All years 1.0% 11 of 1,109 office actions
Change -1.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.9%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.8%
2019: PEG
3.4%
4.9%
0.0%
2.0%
1.4%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 2/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
37.5% 3/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 31, 2016 13/149,190 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jun. 15, 2016 13/585,590 Affirmed §102
Jul. 8, 2015 12/675,556 Affirmed N/A
Jan. 22, 2013 11/644,460 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 27, 2012 11/740,513 Reversed §102 · §103
Jul. 27, 2012 12/288,515 Affirmed §102
Jul. 27, 2011 11/138,058 Affirmed in part §103
Jan. 20, 2011 11/084,934 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.