Examiner Natalia Levkovich

Grant ratio: 62.5% (79th percentile in Art Unit 1798 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.24. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: January 2026
Grant ratio 62.5%
Average office actions / grant 2.24
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80563
Primary art unit
1798
Work group
1790
Technology center
1700
Applications
797
Granted applications
498

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 28 48.6% 2.19
Group 303 36.1% 2.12
Tech Center 1,810 43.6% 2.14
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.23 1,799 office actions across 807 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 807 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 286 35.4%
2 OAs 261 32.3%
3 OAs 140 17.3%
4 OAs 74 9.2%
5+ OAs 46 5.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 46.4% 2008 2009: 61.2% 2009 2010: 31.0% 2010 2011: 40.5% 2011 2012: 46.3% 2012 2013: 62.2% 2013 2014: 62.2% 2014 2015: 72.1% 2015 2016: 68.2% 2016 2017: 55.3% 2017 2018: 65.8% 2018 2019: 77.4% 2019 2020: 90.2% 2020 2021: 77.5% 2021 2022: 63.9% 2022 2023: 76.2% 2023 2024: 73.8% 2024 2025: 38.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008281346.4%
2009493061.2%
2010421331.0%
2011371540.5%
2012542546.3%
2013744662.2%
2014452862.2%
2015433172.1%
2016443068.2%
2017382155.3%
2018382565.8%
2019534177.4%
2020413790.2%
2021403177.5%
2022362363.9%
2023423276.2%
2024614573.8%
2025311238.7%
2026100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 807 1.1% 33.8% 42.8% 13.8%
Action 2 521 1.3% 18.4% 45.7% 31.3%
Action 3 260 2.7% 16.9% 44.6% 29.6%
Action 4 120 4.2% 15.8% 43.3% 33.3%
Action 5 46 0.0% 13.0% 50.0% 32.6%
Action 6 25 0.0% 4.0% 40.0% 56.0%
Action 7 12 0.0% 16.7% 41.7% 25.0%
Action 8 7 14.3% 14.3% 14.3% 57.1%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.2% 2 of 167 office actions
All years 1.6% 29 of 1,799 office actions
Change -0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.0%
1.0%
0.9%
0.7%
0.0%
4.9%
2014: Alice
5.3%
1.5%
1.0%
3.7%
3.6%
2019: PEG
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
1.1%
2025: August memo
1.9%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
57.1% 4/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
57.1% 4/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
19.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 28, 2014 11/861,979 Reversed N/A
Mar. 26, 2014 12/303,448 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
Apr. 30, 2013 12/185,515 Reversed N/A
Nov. 22, 2011 10/835,101 Reversed §102
Sep. 12, 2011 10/896,413 Affirmed §102 · §112
Feb. 24, 2011 10/285,756 Affirmed N/A
Jan. 20, 2011 11/172,685 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.