Examiner William H. Beisner

Grant ratio: 57.7% (80th percentile in Art Unit 1799 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.97. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 57.7%
Average office actions / grant 1.97
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
67262
Primary art unit
1799
Work group
1790
Technology center
1700
Applications
999
Granted applications
576
Examiner phone
(571) 272-1269

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 25 40.2% 2.27
Group 303 36.1% 2.12
Tech Center 1,816 43.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.92 1,919 office actions across 999 applications
Applications with office actions 99.2% 991 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 8 0.8%
1 OA 460 46.0%
2 OAs 313 31.3%
3 OAs 117 11.7%
4 OAs 67 6.7%
5+ OAs 34 3.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 56.7% 2008 2009: 51.0% 2009 2010: 50.0% 2010 2011: 66.1% 2011 2012: 48.1% 2012 2013: 56.9% 2013 2014: 58.3% 2014 2015: 50.0% 2015 2016: 69.4% 2016 2017: 64.0% 2017 2018: 68.0% 2018 2019: 66.0% 2019 2020: 67.5% 2020 2021: 83.3% 2021 2022: 57.1% 2022 2023: 78.6% 2023 2024: 64.2% 2024 2025: 34.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008603456.7%
2009512651.0%
2010562850.0%
2011624166.1%
2012542648.1%
2013583356.9%
2014724258.3%
2015502550.0%
2016624369.4%
2017503264.0%
2018503468.0%
2019473166.0%
2020402767.5%
2021484083.3%
2022492857.1%
2023423378.6%
2024533464.2%
2025551934.5%
20264000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 991 0.6% 6.3% 64.4% 11.2%
Action 2 531 0.9% 15.6% 65.2% 13.4%
Action 3 218 0.5% 15.6% 70.6% 9.6%
Action 4 101 2.0% 5.9% 80.2% 10.9%
Action 5 34 0.0% 5.9% 85.3% 2.9%
Action 6 21 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 7 11 0.0% 18.2% 72.7% 9.1%
Action 8 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.4% 3 of 218 office actions
All years 0.7% 14 of 1,919 office actions
Change +0.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.6%
0.0%
1.8%
0.8%
0.9%
0.0%
2014: Alice
1.6%
0.9%
1.7%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
2024: AI examples
2.5%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
20.0% 1/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
18.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 3, 2025 17/543,090 Affirmed §102 · §103
Nov. 30, 2022 15/480,586 Reversed §103
Sep. 10, 2015 12/267,683 Affirmed §103
Mar. 19, 2014 11/975,234 Affirmed in part §103
Feb. 3, 2012 11/688,491 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.