Examiner Danielle Henkel

Grant ratio: 51.1% (54th percentile in Art Unit 1799 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.87. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 51.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.87
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85175
Primary art unit
1799
Work group
1790
Technology center
1700
Applications
679
Granted applications
347
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5505
Supervisor
Michael Marcheschi
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-1374

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 25 40.2% 2.27
Group 303 36.1% 2.12
Tech Center 1,816 43.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.60 1,766 office actions across 679 applications
Applications with office actions 99.0% 672 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 7 1.0%
1 OA 202 29.7%
2 OAs 198 29.2%
3 OAs 101 14.9%
4 OAs 88 13.0%
5+ OAs 83 12.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 22.2% 2008 2009: 16.7% 2009 2010: 42.1% 2010 2011: 36.4% 2011 2012: 43.8% 2012 2013: 25.7% 2013 2014: 70.4% 2014 2015: 39.4% 2015 2016: 46.9% 2016 2017: 58.8% 2017 2018: 65.0% 2018 2019: 67.5% 2019 2020: 80.0% 2020 2021: 90.0% 2021 2022: 67.7% 2022 2023: 81.0% 2023 2024: 58.3% 2024 2025: 21.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20089222.2%
200936616.7%
2010381642.1%
2011331236.4%
2012321443.8%
201335925.7%
2014271970.4%
2015331339.4%
2016492346.9%
2017342058.8%
2018402665.0%
2019402767.5%
2020504080.0%
2021403690.0%
2022312167.7%
2023423481.0%
2024362158.3%
202537821.6%
20263700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 672 0.0% 4.8% 74.6% 1.3%
Action 2 470 0.0% 5.1% 80.4% 3.0%
Action 3 272 0.0% 1.5% 87.1% 2.6%
Action 4 171 0.0% 0.6% 87.7% 3.5%
Action 5 83 0.0% 1.2% 92.8% 3.6%
Action 6 48 0.0% 2.1% 81.3% 2.1%
Action 7 24 0.0% 0.0% 87.5% 4.2%
Action 8 16 0.0% 0.0% 87.5% 6.3%
Action 9 7 0.0% 0.0% 57.1% 0.0%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 219 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 1,766 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 5 reversed.

Full reversal rate
71.4% 5/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
71.4% 5/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
19.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 6, 2020 14/472,683 Reversed §102 · §103
Oct. 8, 2019 14/165,085 Affirmed §103 · §112
Sep. 20, 2017 13/152,303 Reversed §102 · §103
Nov. 16, 2016 11/957,296 Reversed N/A
Mar. 25, 2016 12/710,552 Reversed §103
Sep. 14, 2015 12/529,536 Reversed §103
Jan. 30, 2013 11/508,598 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.