Examiner Stefan Stoynov

Grant ratio: 86.8% (91st percentile in Art Unit 2116 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.40. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 86.8%
Average office actions / grant 1.40
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80582
Primary art unit
2116
Work group
2110
Technology center
2100
Applications
857
Granted applications
744
Examiner phone
(571) 272-4236
Supervisor
Kim Huynh
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-3779

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 35 64.4% 1.81
Group 214 64.2% 1.69
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.39 1,191 office actions across 857 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 857 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 621 72.5%
2 OAs 175 20.4%
3 OAs 40 4.7%
4 OAs 9 1.1%
5+ OAs 12 1.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 80.6% 2008 2009: 76.5% 2009 2010: 87.9% 2010 2011: 92.2% 2011 2012: 92.4% 2012 2013: 81.4% 2013 2014: 96.6% 2014 2015: 84.1% 2015 2016: 87.8% 2016 2017: 92.2% 2017 2018: 93.5% 2018 2019: 95.9% 2019 2020: 91.4% 2020 2021: 97.8% 2021 2022: 93.8% 2022 2023: 86.5% 2023 2024: 90.0% 2024 2025: 60.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008362980.6%
2009513976.5%
2010585187.9%
2011645992.2%
2012666192.4%
2013594881.4%
2014595796.6%
2015443784.1%
2016413687.8%
2017514792.2%
2018312993.5%
2019494795.9%
2020353291.4%
2021454497.8%
2022484593.8%
2023373286.5%
2024403690.0%
2025251560.0%
20261800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 857 10.0% 12.6% 44.6% 27.3%
Action 2 236 3.0% 16.9% 58.5% 16.9%
Action 3 61 1.6% 16.4% 70.5% 8.2%
Action 4 21 0.0% 23.8% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 5 12 0.0% 16.7% 66.7% 8.3%
Action 6 3 0.0% 33.3% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 7 1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 3.2% 4 of 126 office actions
All years 7.9% 94 of 1,191 office actions
Change -4.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

4.6%
1.5%
3.9%
3.8%
15.8%
10.7%
2014: Alice
13.3%
0.0%
8.1%
8.9%
20.4%
2019: PEG
15.0%
10.9%
7.4%
0.0%
7.8%
2024: AI examples
3.6%
2025: August memo
0.0%
5.6%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
20.0% 1/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
20.0% 1/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
18.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 9, 2024 16/800,424 Affirmed N/A
Jan. 23, 2023 15/949,662 Reversed §112
Jun. 6, 2022 15/450,915 Affirmed §103 · §120
May. 23, 2016 13/424,861 Affirmed §103
Jun. 24, 2015 12/685,928 Affirmed §101 · §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.