AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Nathan L Laughlin

Examiner Nathan L Laughlin appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 62.3%, they average 2.21 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC About Average
Difficulty vs USPTO About Average
Average OA / Grant 2.21
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-1042
Predicted Supervisor
Mohammad Ali
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-4105
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2120 - Artificial Intelligence

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
788
Granted Applications
491
Non-Granted Applications
297
Avg OA / Grant
2.21
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2118 , 2119 , 2122 , 2123 , 2126 , 2127
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 62.3% 2.21
Art Unit 15 56.3% 1.81
Group 316 48.6% 1.98
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 33 16 48.5%
2009 49 23 46.9%
2010 36 21 58.3%
2011 42 28 66.7%
2012 49 29 59.2%
2013 41 23 56.1%
2014 38 26 68.4%
2015 41 31 75.6%
2016 46 26 56.5%
2017 49 36 73.5%
2018 36 23 63.9%
2019 43 24 55.8%
2020 43 31 72.1%
2021 38 30 78.9%
2022 45 38 84.4%
2023 50 38 76.0%
2024 35 26 74.3%
2025 55 22 40.0%
2026 19 0 0.0%

491 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 779 1.2% 14.0% 73.0% 8.1%
2 480 0.6% 19.4% 71.3% 6.0%
3 252 0.8% 11.5% 82.1% 4.8%
4 152 0.0% 3.3% 90.1% 3.3%
5 68 1.5% 1.5% 91.2% 4.4%
6 36 0.0% 8.3% 86.1% 5.6%
7 14 0.0% 21.4% 71.4% 0.0%
8 8 0.0% 0.0% 87.5% 0.0%
9 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0%
10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
2.8%
2008
0.0%
2009
0.0%
2010
0.8%
2011
1.3%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.8%
2016
5.1%
2017
1.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
1.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
1.4%
2024
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.