Examiner Ryan Bertram

Grant ratio: 84.0% (86th percentile in Art Unit 2137 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.65. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: September 2026
Grant ratio 84.0%
Average office actions / grant 1.65
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82715
Primary art unit
2137
Work group
2130
Technology center
2100
Applications
689
Granted applications
579
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1377
Supervisor
Arpan Savla
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-1077

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 68.6% 1.90
Group 138 68.4% 2.08
Tech Center 1,807 51.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.64 1,127 office actions across 689 applications
Applications with office actions 97.2% 670 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 19 2.8%
1 OA 400 58.1%
2 OAs 160 23.2%
3 OAs 61 8.9%
4 OAs 28 4.1%
5+ OAs 21 3.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 73.9% 2008 2009: 76.5% 2009 2010: 74.3% 2010 2011: 88.9% 2011 2012: 87.0% 2012 2013: 95.5% 2013 2014: 94.4% 2014 2015: 96.7% 2015 2016: 81.4% 2016 2017: 81.6% 2017 2018: 83.9% 2018 2019: 87.5% 2019 2020: 92.1% 2020 2021: 100.0% 2021 2022: 91.7% 2022 2023: 94.4% 2023 2024: 94.1% 2024 2025: 61.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008231773.9%
2009342676.5%
2010352674.3%
2011363288.9%
2012544787.0%
2013444295.5%
2014363494.4%
2015302996.7%
2016433581.4%
2017383181.6%
2018312683.9%
2019403587.5%
2020383592.1%
20214444100.0%
2022363391.7%
2023363494.4%
2024343294.1%
2025342161.8%
20262300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 670 3.0% 14.0% 70.6% 1.8%
Action 2 270 1.1% 5.2% 85.2% 1.5%
Action 3 110 0.9% 3.6% 94.5% 0.0%
Action 4 49 0.0% 2.0% 95.9% 0.0%
Action 5 21 0.0% 4.8% 90.5% 0.0%
Action 6 5 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 7 1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.1% 3 of 146 office actions
All years 2.1% 24 of 1,127 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.8%
0.0%
4.6%
6.6%
6.1%
2014: Alice
2.3%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
1.5%
2019: PEG
1.4%
0.0%
1.5%
3.4%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
1.8%
2025: August memo
3.7%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
12.5% 1/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 2/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
29.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 7, 2024 17/158,095 Affirmed §103
Jun. 23, 2016 13/096,404 Affirmed §102 · §103
Mar. 17, 2016 12/971,012 Affirmed §103
Aug. 20, 2015 12/148,165 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 29, 2013 11/106,006 Reversed §103
Mar. 26, 2013 11/343,698 Affirmed §103
Dec. 31, 2012 11/343,765 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Jun. 5, 2012 11/028,678 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.