AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Jason W Blust

Examiner Jason W Blust appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 72.2%, they average 1.74 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.74
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
13 years (2014-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-6302
Predicted Supervisor
Hosain Alam
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-3978
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2130 - Memory Access and Control

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
299
Granted Applications
216
Non-Granted Applications
83
Avg OA / Grant
1.74
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2132 , 2137
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 72.2% 1.74
Art Unit 24 68.5% 1.95
Group 138 69.8% 2.08
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2014; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2014 16 12 75.0%
2015 23 16 69.6%
2016 17 13 76.5%
2017 22 15 68.2%
2018 28 21 75.0%
2019 21 17 81.0%
2020 23 19 82.6%
2021 21 18 85.7%
2022 35 28 80.0%
2023 24 23 95.8%
2024 32 27 84.4%
2025 24 7 29.2%
2026 13 0 0.0%

216 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 290 1.4% 14.5% 74.8% 2.8%
2 146 2.1% 12.3% 80.8% 1.4%
3 61 1.6% 8.2% 88.5% 1.6%
4 30 0.0% 6.7% 90.0% 3.3%
5 11 0.0% 9.1% 90.9% 0.0%
6 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
0.0%
2017
7.3%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
5.7%
2021
0.0%
2022
2.7%
2023
0.0%
2024
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.