Examiner Tracy C. Chan

Grant ratio: 68.5% (32nd percentile in Art Unit 2138 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.26. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 68.5%
Average office actions / grant 2.26
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
90978
Primary art unit
2138
Work group
2130
Technology center
2100
Applications
387
Granted applications
265
Examiner phone
(571) 272-9992

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 21 71.0% 2.15
Group 138 68.4% 2.08
Tech Center 1,807 51.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.52 975 office actions across 387 applications
Applications with office actions 99.0% 383 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 4 1.0%
1 OA 162 41.9%
2 OAs 73 18.9%
3 OAs 57 14.7%
4 OAs 47 12.1%
5+ OAs 44 11.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014: 66.7% 2014 2015: 96.8% 2015 2016: 65.2% 2016 2017: 68.8% 2017 2018: 76.9% 2018 2019: 72.2% 2019 2020: 71.4% 2020 2021: 86.1% 2021 2022: 71.0% 2022 2023: 84.6% 2023 2024: 76.9% 2024 2025: 50.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201412866.7%
2015313096.8%
2016231565.2%
2017322268.8%
2018262076.9%
2019362672.2%
2020282071.4%
2021363186.1%
2022312271.0%
2023393384.6%
2024262076.9%
2025361850.0%
20263100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 383 1.3% 6.5% 68.9% 2.6%
Action 2 221 0.9% 2.7% 83.3% 1.8%
Action 3 148 0.7% 1.4% 84.5% 0.7%
Action 4 91 1.1% 0.0% 86.8% 2.2%
Action 5 44 2.3% 0.0% 81.8% 0.0%
Action 6 31 0.0% 0.0% 83.9% 0.0%
Action 7 22 0.0% 4.5% 72.7% 4.5%
Action 8 15 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 6.7%
Action 9 9 0.0% 0.0% 55.6% 0.0%
Action 10 6 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 160 office actions
All years 1.0% 10 of 975 office actions
Change -1.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
2014: Alice
2.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
2019: PEG
1.0%
4.3%
2.4%
1.3%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.0 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 3, 2023 16/121,938 Reversed New ground of rejection §103 · §112
Aug. 23, 2021 14/958,050 Affirmed §103 · §112
Dec. 11, 2020 15/808,581 Affirmed §103
Dec. 31, 2019 13/720,675 Reversed §103 · §112
Feb. 13, 2017 13/673,570 Affirmed §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.