Examiner Claudia Dragoescu

Grant ratio: 74.8% (92nd percentile in Art Unit 2141 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.00. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: November 2024
Grant ratio 74.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.00
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87546
Primary art unit
2141
Work group
2140
Technology center
2100
Applications
473
Granted applications
354

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 25 33.3% 2.64
Group 177 32.8% 2.41
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.13 1,026 office actions across 481 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 481 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 149 31.0%
2 OAs 237 49.3%
3 OAs 29 6.0%
4 OAs 38 7.9%
5+ OAs 28 5.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 15.4% 2011 2012: 33.3% 2012 2013: 47.1% 2013 2014: 53.1% 2014 2015: 69.2% 2015 2016: 81.1% 2016 2017: 87.9% 2017 2018: 89.2% 2018 2019: 73.8% 2019 2020: 86.5% 2020 2021: 92.1% 2021 2022: 88.6% 2022 2023: 93.5% 2023 2024: 84.0% 2024

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201113215.4%
201224833.3%
2013341647.1%
2014321753.1%
2015392769.2%
2016534381.1%
2017332987.9%
2018373389.2%
2019423173.8%
2020373286.5%
2021383592.1%
2022353188.6%
2023312993.5%
2024252184.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 481 0.2% 3.3% 94.8% 0.2%
Action 2 332 0.0% 0.3% 98.8% 0.0%
Action 3 95 0.0% 1.1% 98.9% 0.0%
Action 4 66 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 5 28 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 16 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 63 office actions
All years 0.1% 1 of 1,026 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 13. Merits outcomes: 7 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
30.8% 4/13 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
46.2% 6/13 decisions
Median appeal duration
25.9 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 11, 2023 16/820,195 Affirmed §103 · §112
Sep. 17, 2018 12/490,978 Reversed §103
Jun. 30, 2017 13/299,271 Affirmed §103
Jun. 8, 2017 12/469,639 Affirmed §103
Jun. 6, 2017 13/453,143 Affirmed §103
Apr. 28, 2017 13/007,547 Reversed §103
Dec. 28, 2015 12/394,307 Reversed New ground of rejection N/A
Dec. 10, 2015 12/924,129 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 10, 2015 12/164,037 Affirmed in part N/A
Sep. 8, 2015 12/393,868 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 8, 2015 12/395,156 Reversed N/A
Aug. 17, 2015 12/267,815 Affirmed in part N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.