Examiner Sherrod Keaton

Grant ratio: 46.5% (61st percentile in Art Unit 2142 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.80. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 46.5%
Average office actions / grant 3.80
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83243
Primary art unit
2142
Work group
2140
Technology center
2100
Applications
609
Granted applications
283
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1697
Supervisor
Michelle Bechtold
Supervisor phone
(571) 431-0762

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 28 33.3% 2.55
Group 177 32.8% 2.41
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.51 2,140 office actions across 609 applications
Applications with office actions 98.2% 598 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 11 1.8%
1 OA 96 15.8%
2 OAs 142 23.3%
3 OAs 105 17.2%
4 OAs 89 14.6%
5+ OAs 166 27.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 60.0% 2007 2008: 27.8% 2008 2009: 33.3% 2009 2010: 33.3% 2010 2011: 56.7% 2011 2012: 53.6% 2012 2013: 42.4% 2013 2014: 42.9% 2014 2015: 67.9% 2015 2016: 50.0% 2016 2017: 42.1% 2017 2018: 60.0% 2018 2019: 46.2% 2019 2020: 52.5% 2020 2021: 68.8% 2021 2022: 65.9% 2022 2023: 66.7% 2023 2024: 45.9% 2024 2025: 21.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20075360.0%
200818527.8%
200921733.3%
201018633.3%
2011301756.7%
2012281553.6%
2013331442.4%
2014351542.9%
2015281967.9%
2016261350.0%
2017381642.1%
2018301860.0%
2019391846.2%
2020402152.5%
2021322268.8%
2022412765.9%
2023332266.7%
2024371745.9%
202537821.6%
20264000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 598 0.5% 6.4% 83.6% 0.0%
Action 2 502 1.2% 3.0% 89.0% 0.2%
Action 3 360 1.4% 1.9% 92.8% 0.3%
Action 4 255 1.6% 2.7% 91.4% 0.8%
Action 5 166 0.0% 2.4% 95.2% 0.6%
Action 6 113 1.8% 0.9% 96.5% 0.0%
Action 7 56 0.0% 0.0% 98.2% 0.0%
Action 8 34 2.9% 0.0% 94.1% 0.0%
Action 9 20 5.0% 0.0% 85.0% 5.0%
Action 10 15 13.3% 0.0% 80.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 4.6% 12 of 259 office actions
All years 1.3% 27 of 2,140 office actions
Change +3.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.8%
2014: Alice
0.7%
0.8%
0.8%
3.1%
2.4%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
1.0%
0.9%
2024: AI examples
8.9%
2025: August memo
3.7%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 35. Merits outcomes: 21 affirmed, 5 affirmed in part, and 9 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.7% 9/35 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
40.0% 14/35 decisions
Median appeal duration
27.1 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 23, 2022 14/801,067 Affirmed in part §102 · §112
Apr. 28, 2022 15/711,381 Affirmed §103
Jul. 13, 2021 14/357,444 Affirmed §103
Jun. 18, 2020 14/107,150 Affirmed §101 · §103
May. 26, 2020 13/723,385 Reversed §103
Dec. 19, 2019 15/040,124 Reversed §102
Nov. 1, 2017 13/109,989 Affirmed in part §103
Jun. 23, 2017 12/729,797 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §103 · §112
May. 31, 2017 13/542,146 Affirmed §103
Nov. 29, 2016 13/109,603 Affirmed §103
Oct. 20, 2016 12/275,726 Affirmed §101 · §103
Aug. 10, 2016 12/560,529 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.