Examiner Namitha Pillai

Grant ratio: 61.9% (84th percentile in Art Unit 2143 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.18. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: December 2020
Grant ratio 61.9%
Average office actions / grant 3.18
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
79618
Primary art unit
2143
Work group
2140
Technology center
2100
Applications
378
Granted applications
234

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 29 38.0% 2.33
Group 186 31.1% 2.42
Tech Center 1,817 51.4% 2.19
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.13 1,238 office actions across 396 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 396 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 91 23.0%
2 OAs 100 25.3%
3 OAs 66 16.7%
4 OAs 56 14.1%
5+ OAs 83 21.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 25.0% 2008 2009: 47.2% 2009 2010: 65.2% 2010 2011: 67.7% 2011 2012: 72.7% 2012 2013: 75.9% 2013 2014: 55.3% 2014 2015: 80.6% 2015 2016: 66.7% 2016 2017: 60.5% 2017 2018: 52.9% 2018 2019: 54.5% 2019 2020: 64.7% 2020

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20088225.0%
2009361747.2%
2010231565.2%
2011312167.7%
2012221672.7%
2013292275.9%
2014382155.3%
2015312580.6%
2016211466.7%
2017382360.5%
2018341852.9%
2019331854.5%
2020342264.7%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 396 1.0% 43.2% 54.5% 0.0%
Action 2 305 1.0% 23.9% 72.1% 0.7%
Action 3 205 3.9% 10.2% 83.4% 0.0%
Action 4 139 1.4% 5.8% 87.8% 1.4%
Action 5 83 2.4% 6.0% 85.5% 1.2%
Action 6 51 3.9% 3.9% 90.2% 2.0%
Action 7 30 0.0% 6.7% 90.0% 3.3%
Action 8 13 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 1.7% 21 of 1,238 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
2.4%
3.1%
2.5%
4.5%
2.1%
2014: Alice
0.8%
3.0%
0.0%
1.1%
2.4%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 24. Merits outcomes: 13 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 8 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 8/24 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
45.8% 11/24 decisions
Median appeal duration
28.6 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 22, 2022 15/972,985 Affirmed §103
Dec. 24, 2021 15/695,844 Affirmed §103
Oct. 26, 2021 13/075,906 Affirmed §103
Aug. 5, 2021 14/823,643 Affirmed §103
Feb. 1, 2021 14/858,725 Affirmed in part §103
Nov. 3, 2020 14/984,335 Reversed §103
Jul. 8, 2020 13/595,213 Reversed §103
May. 26, 2017 12/200,475 Reversed §103
Apr. 26, 2017 12/039,789 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
Feb. 6, 2017 13/545,306 Reversed New ground of rejection §103 · §112
Jul. 13, 2016 12/788,485 Reversed §102
Nov. 17, 2015 10/782,964 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.