AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Maria S Ayad

Examiner Maria S Ayad appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 25.4%, they average 3.16 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 3.16
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
13 years (2014-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-2743
Predicted Supervisor
Adam Queler
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-4140
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2140 - Artificial Intelligence

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
197
Granted Applications
50
Non-Granted Applications
147
Avg OA / Grant
3.16
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2145 , 2172 , 2175
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 25.4% 3.16
Art Unit 21 29.6% 3.12
Group 158 37.3% 2.41
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2014; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2014 10 1 10.0%
2015 13 1 7.7%
2016 13 1 7.7%
2017 12 4 33.3%
2018 17 5 29.4%
2019 19 11 57.9%
2020 11 6 54.5%
2021 8 2 25.0%
2022 15 6 40.0%
2023 12 4 33.3%
2024 14 5 35.7%
2025 29 4 13.8%
2026 24 0 0.0%

50 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 195 1.5% 1.0% 85.6% 3.1%
2 154 15.6% 1.9% 61.7% 18.8%
3 100 13.0% 1.0% 71.0% 13.0%
4 78 5.1% 0.0% 78.2% 12.8%
5 43 0.0% 0.0% 88.4% 7.0%
6 28 3.6% 0.0% 78.6% 14.3%
7 9 11.1% 0.0% 66.7% 22.2%
8 4 25.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0%
9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2013
11.5%
2014
6.7%
2015
1.9%
2016
4.3%
2017
14.9%
2018
0.0%
2019
2.6%
2020
7.1%
2021
2.1%
2022
2.2%
2023
7.4%
2024
18.0%
2025
25.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.